Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 20:17:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 20:17:00 -0500 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([204.152.189.113]:45264 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 20:16:41 -0500 Message-ID: <3C082F1D.60503@lnxw.com> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 17:15:09 -0800 From: Petko Manolov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011130 X-Accept-Language: en, bg MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Rik van Riel , Andrew Morton , Larry McVoy , Daniel Phillips , Henning Schmiedehausen , Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Coding style - a non-issue In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org :-)) This made my day.. May be my week. :-)) 100% agree (better not play gods) and i think this is the end of the discussion. Petko Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Rik van Riel wrote: > >>I'm very interested too, though I'll have to agree with Larry >>that Linux really isn't going anywhere in particular and seems >>to be making progress through sheer luck. >> > > Hey, that's not a bug, that's a FEATURE! > > You know what the most complex piece of engineering known to man in the > whole solar system is? > > Guess what - it's not Linux, it's not Solaris, and it's not your car. > > It's you. And me. > > And think about how you and me actually came about - not through any > complex design. > > Right. "sheer luck". > > Well, sheer luck, AND: > - free availability and _crosspollination_ through sharing of "source > code", although biologists call it DNA. > - a rather unforgiving user environment, that happily replaces bad > versions of us with better working versions and thus culls the herd > (biologists often call this "survival of the fittest") > - massive undirected parallel development ("trial and error") > > I'm deadly serious: we humans have _never_ been able to replicate > something more complicated than what we ourselves are, yet natural > selection did it without even thinking. > > Don't underestimate the power of survival of the fittest. > > And don't EVER make the mistake that you can design something better than > what you get from ruthless massively parallel trial-and-error with a > feedback cycle. That's giving your intelligence _much_ too much credit. > > Quite frankly, Sun is doomed. And it has nothing to do with their > engineering practices or their coding style. > > Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/