Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sun, 03 Jul 2022 12:45:18 +0100
From:   Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/ingenic: Use the highest possible DMA burst size
To:     Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc:     David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, list@opendingux.net,
        Christophe Branchereau <cbranchereau@gmail.com>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org
Message-Id: <IN0GER.UCST485AI2YD1@crapouillou.net>
In-Reply-To: <YsE6mZanHLy9LpBd@ravnborg.org>
References: <20220702230727.66704-1-paul@crapouillou.net>
        <YsE6mZanHLy9LpBd@ravnborg.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

Hi Sam,

Le dim., juil. 3 2022 at 08:43:37 +0200, Sam Ravnborg=20
<sam@ravnborg.org> a =E9crit :
> Hi Paul,
>=20
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 12:07:27AM +0100, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>>  Until now, when running at the maximum resolution of 1280x720 at=20
>> 32bpp
>>  on the JZ4770 SoC the output was garbled, the X/Y position of the
>>  top-left corner of the framebuffer warping to a random position with
>>  the whole image being offset accordingly, every time a new frame was
>>  being submitted.
>>=20
>>  This problem can be eliminated by using a bigger burst size for the=20
>> DMA.
>=20
> Are there any alignment constraints of the framebuffer that depends on
> the burst size? I am hit by this with some atmel IP - which is why I
> ask.

I would think that the framebuffer needs to be aligned with the burst=20
size, indeed. Here, our buffers are always page-aligned so that's not a=20
problem.

> Patch looks good and is a-b.

Thanks!

Cheers,
-Paul

>>=20
>>  Set in each soc_info structure the maximum burst size supported by=20
>> the
>>  corresponding SoC, and use it in the driver.
>>=20
>>  Set the new value using regmap_update_bits() instead of
>>  regmap_set_bits(), since we do want to override the old value of the
>>  burst size. (Note that regmap_set_bits() wasn't really valid before=20
>> for
>>  the same reason, but it never seemed to be a problem).
>>=20
>>  Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
>>  Fixes: 90b86fcc47b4 ("DRM: Add KMS driver for the Ingenic JZ47xx=20
>> SoCs")
>>  Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
> Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>