Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sun, 03 Jul 2022 14:46:56 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
To:     Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
CC:     sedat.dilek@gmail.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>,
        linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: =?US-ASCII?Q?Re=3A_=5Bperf-tools=5D_Build-error_in_too?= =?US-ASCII?Q?ls/perf/util/annotate=2Ec_with_LLVM-14?=
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <20220703165448.7d2akxawzdvqigat@awork3.anarazel.de>
References: <CA+icZUVVXq0Mh8=QuopF0tMZyZ0Tn8AiKEZoA3jfP47Q8B=x2A@mail.gmail.com> <CA+icZUW3VrDC8J4MnNb1H3nGYQggBwY4zOoaJkzSsNj7xKDvyQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+icZUVcCMCGEaxytyJd_-Ur-Ey_gWyXx=tApo-SVUqbX_bhUA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+icZUVpr8ZeOKCj4zMMqbFT013KJz2T1csvXg+VSkdvJH1Ubw@mail.gmail.com> <1496A989-23D2-474D-B941-BA2D74761A7E@gmail.com> <20220703165448.7d2akxawzdvqigat@awork3.anarazel.de>
Message-ID: <F7CCD284-0DEF-444F-B58F-930678EC2644@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk


On July 3, 2022 1:54:48 PM GMT-03:00, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel=2Ede>=
 wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On 2022-07-03 10:54:45 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> That series should be split a bit further, so that the
>> new features test is in a separate patch, i=2Ee=2E I don't process bpft=
ool patches, but can process the feature test and the tools/perf part=2E
>
>Ok, will split it further=2E Should I do
>
>1) feature test
>2) introduce compat header header
>3) use feature test, use header in perf/
>4) use feature test, use header in bpf/
>
>Or should 3, 4 be split to separately introduce the feature test and use =
of
>the compat header?

I think 4 patches are ok,=20

- Arnaldo

>
>Greetings,
>
>Andres Freund