Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+icZUVVXq0Mh8=QuopF0tMZyZ0Tn8AiKEZoA3jfP47Q8B=x2A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+icZUW3VrDC8J4MnNb1H3nGYQggBwY4zOoaJkzSsNj7xKDvyQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+icZUVcCMCGEaxytyJd_-Ur-Ey_gWyXx=tApo-SVUqbX_bhUA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+icZUVpr8ZeOKCj4zMMqbFT013KJz2T1csvXg+VSkdvJH1Ubw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1496A989-23D2-474D-B941-BA2D74761A7E@gmail.com> <20220703165448.7d2akxawzdvqigat@awork3.anarazel.de>
 <F7CCD284-0DEF-444F-B58F-930678EC2644@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <F7CCD284-0DEF-444F-B58F-930678EC2644@gmail.com>
Reply-To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com
From:   Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 3 Jul 2022 22:32:26 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+icZUXDaDM2w+YT4EDjgv5uzkh+SYTH6v3PrsLYsvYB2Gw2zw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [perf-tools] Build-error in tools/perf/util/annotate.c with LLVM-14
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
Cc:     Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>,
        linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        bpf@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Jul 3, 2022 at 7:47 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<arnaldo.melo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On July 3, 2022 1:54:48 PM GMT-03:00, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On 2022-07-03 10:54:45 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >> That series should be split a bit further, so that the
> >> new features test is in a separate patch, i.e. I don't process bpftool patches, but can process the feature test and the tools/perf part.
> >
> >Ok, will split it further. Should I do
> >
> >1) feature test
> >2) introduce compat header header
> >3) use feature test, use header in perf/
> >4) use feature test, use header in bpf/
> >
> >Or should 3, 4 be split to separately introduce the feature test and use of
> >the compat header?
>
> I think 4 patches are ok,
>

Andres can you CC me on a new patchset?
Thanks.

-sed@-