Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Feedback-ID: id4a34324:Fastmail
Date:   Sun, 3 Jul 2022 14:31:03 -0700
From:   Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To:     Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>,
        linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [perf-tools] Build-error in tools/perf/util/annotate.c with
 LLVM-14
Message-ID: <20220703213103.n3oxmdnlyjsdrty4@awork3.anarazel.de>
References: <CA+icZUVVXq0Mh8=QuopF0tMZyZ0Tn8AiKEZoA3jfP47Q8B=x2A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+icZUW3VrDC8J4MnNb1H3nGYQggBwY4zOoaJkzSsNj7xKDvyQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+icZUVcCMCGEaxytyJd_-Ur-Ey_gWyXx=tApo-SVUqbX_bhUA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+icZUVpr8ZeOKCj4zMMqbFT013KJz2T1csvXg+VSkdvJH1Ubw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20220703165115.gox3hlwwdcnorcul@awork3.anarazel.de>
 <CA+icZUXCqzZgdSNyPwM+nmdTdPoZrQm2M=2DgOy7j_YHXQ1T6w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+icZUXCqzZgdSNyPwM+nmdTdPoZrQm2M=2DgOy7j_YHXQ1T6w@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On 2022-07-03 22:40:22 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> My test-case was to build a Linux v5.19-rc4 plus custom patches
> including your v1 patchset.

> make-line:
> 
> /home/dileks/bin/perf stat make V=1 -j4 LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1
> PAHOLE=/opt/pahole/bin/pahole LOCALVERSION=-1-amd64-clang
> 14-lto KBUILD_BUILD_HOST=iniza KBUILD_BUILD_USER=sedat.dilek@gmail.com
> KBUILD_BUILD_TIMESTAMP=2022-07-03 bindeb-pkg
> KDEB_PKGVERSION=5.19.0~rc4-1~bookworm+dileks1
> [...]
> Hmmm, it took a bit longer as usual.

I don't think the patches would affect the performance of this workload - I
don't know the kernel build process well, but I don't see why anything in it
would trigger bpf programs to be disassembled? I guess the additional three
feature tests can take a tiny bit of time, but...

Sent out a new version, did add you as a CC.

Greetings,

Andres Freund