Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <2f9a95b8-d883-d5a3-3714-801bae36eec2@suse.cz>
Date:   Mon, 4 Jul 2022 16:28:50 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.10.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] mm/page_alloc: Remotely drain per-cpu lists
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>,
        Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
References: <20220624125423.6126-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net>
 <20220624125423.6126-7-mgorman@techsingularity.net>
From:   Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20220624125423.6126-7-mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 6/24/22 14:54, Mel Gorman wrote:
> From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>
> 
> Some setups, notably NOHZ_FULL CPUs, are too busy to handle the per-cpu
> drain work queued by __drain_all_pages().  So introduce a new mechanism to
> remotely drain the per-cpu lists.  It is made possible by remotely locking
> 'struct per_cpu_pages' new per-cpu spinlocks.  A benefit of this new
> scheme is that drain operations are now migration safe.
> 
> There was no observed performance degradation vs.  the previous scheme.
> Both netperf and hackbench were run in parallel to triggering the
> __drain_all_pages(NULL, true) code path around ~100 times per second.  The
> new scheme performs a bit better (~5%), although the important point here
> is there are no performance regressions vs.  the previous mechanism.
> Per-cpu lists draining happens only in slow paths.
> 
> Minchan Kim tested an earlier version and reported;
> 
> 	My workload is not NOHZ CPUs but run apps under heavy memory
> 	pressure so they goes to direct reclaim and be stuck on
> 	drain_all_pages until work on workqueue run.
> 
> 	unit: nanosecond
> 	max(dur)        avg(dur)                count(dur)
> 	166713013       487511.77786438033      1283
> 
> 	From traces, system encountered the drain_all_pages 1283 times and
> 	worst case was 166ms and avg was 487us.
> 
> 	The other problem was alloc_contig_range in CMA. The PCP draining
> 	takes several hundred millisecond sometimes though there is no
> 	memory pressure or a few of pages to be migrated out but CPU were
> 	fully booked.
> 
> 	Your patch perfectly removed those wasted time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>

Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>