Received: by 2002:ad5:4acb:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n11csp257627imw; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 08:39:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tij2oRubfyxpTskErZbZCGX96rdp+CkuE8KnF/E22Rf7M9OMdx8YAJv98R76/zlCUsvJUC X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:32c4:b0:16a:4201:45e4 with SMTP id i4-20020a17090332c400b0016a420145e4mr36820573plr.108.1656949163631; Mon, 04 Jul 2022 08:39:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1656949163; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=W6Bh1W/0g1wHdPxLMCkNdVWI99TJXyfT33ZVb7jwejWUAMA1/q1WcT4YHVmH6Tyngz 9yrx7yg08ccMknl0JqbpbwcUXLFGBrmWPP4Niz9RGmWA0Zny1Lwp6ngI5rlynnYJCzOj NSzU1JsXmHybrEjU0BoXEE6uDDFrDTxKcjZAY2B3OBEFCHKaYaoaaipc7c1iq4+bWocJ MWRYbj8MrFDBXxbpP9cBPguRmZUJDft4Q9srTmEjMZ9/8sMytAaGUtORA3kdc50xgG+s ZZhB9mLLxCqDxTR0wfT5QOW90xnVOYJTmADWf/cZnkPJ/o/Z1hdxSHquPzeL321vnSwn yAYw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:from:subject:references:mime-version :message-id:in-reply-to:date:dkim-signature; bh=uSL64WbpOB0aGBID+htWF2mgmyKhVinUXMU6W5OQm+c=; b=G+IdT6UsS8orZ9mFXVC7+mu2J9H3Lr5PcPsoHR6/g9h49Mm/XyRyRiS95BXFJFghw6 Ty2nz6aNHC1E1m/4HLwK5YFVCU+0Ez/LqnOICJVu10t/RprKcStAPxaCvFOvg0uFEDQc miWhv+g6a7VshLgoNipe3cj8Hr9crUYgWR9QwUTlVuV8lsS1H2HxLIPVoaBlI8d69xD3 e6ncymBP4cVzlGyYzKlDt8kTckURe0qCR9KmIVzuSFKymIjS7IRzMfgx/7kmKZuMqj9l /kZVvKGMiK2Xl5K5EbTCaQ9l0O5RyWInWfOsKyTd/wxlaLqfLTDWBe84UlkjSYICtspD xOPA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=oQXvqnJR; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id rm14-20020a17090b3ece00b001ecb1492e0esi26139935pjb.112.2022.07.04.08.39.11; Mon, 04 Jul 2022 08:39:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=oQXvqnJR; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234834AbiGDPGG (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 4 Jul 2022 11:06:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60334 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234755AbiGDPGB (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jul 2022 11:06:01 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x64a.google.com (mail-ej1-x64a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::64a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16143FD05 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 08:06:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x64a.google.com with SMTP id hp8-20020a1709073e0800b0072629757566so2117281ejc.0 for ; Mon, 04 Jul 2022 08:06:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=uSL64WbpOB0aGBID+htWF2mgmyKhVinUXMU6W5OQm+c=; b=oQXvqnJRN2YUeRXyjEdJQP+vrqNNNQCywOqXWoeKjAp+rPtwrQtzpLx0Wk8aIgZjVV MjON88IJiiEEZjsxmyLQpyWXaBBhnvpaQ4BihW5P/xnA0c5ld2AAzZK8VpibpFfh8XWC hiUFpWdZjopmjjNFBHJ8DW5ZrOZyydPvvgZvtSnSJgIXkiQrz4aYRD36QVo4I6f9gd2z ARoX63urkP/sGQfqaCMRgotkZqsM5Z7U7nPuZVsJkzTGJUH5+nWjfd52zlTGwwZZqdms MeEanyJBRzIMLfi2EHHwXmFTyZkIsMmCWXzW6W3mQVj+cFU9azF8ITry42NDWxFKeOtb w7dA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=uSL64WbpOB0aGBID+htWF2mgmyKhVinUXMU6W5OQm+c=; b=jJrjxFwzYnWLAym1NS20oF8DIM+UO8LF01bS08KgMp3rllOakddF2fmt/90OMGu+nK AFigKO5SjLLT1vFTnlTSwjZCqUobEEumfD98vP8ikYn33J/KFHCFirD+yyfvoAxsLxkl SJsAXo2K2w7XoX+gXZcz0e/S/5Hls1ERVHbzbI/yGjwyV3SCyB/v2ob1EX8TLi3dGLgz V8w7cpiC3kGe53aYYhlc6Sc3z7XbiEgwg8SLw9B/uH1sz+ZusgShxDqM2uMSVvvW0een RCJ3StGcdDAQ+5r6caKxyzGIhI6iki8YnEYTJEpnbxKggtc6laOYqeFUPLQF0LfI+Kbm PtWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/NrgfILkIoObMQfWpl3Et5RBJV614gUpeAeeFza7lpAbwvDAyf 8wf5ICcS670GzpOVttxX9KrhWavITw== X-Received: from elver.muc.corp.google.com ([2a00:79e0:9c:201:6edf:e1bc:9a92:4ad0]) (user=elver job=sendgmr) by 2002:a05:6402:350a:b0:435:df44:30aa with SMTP id b10-20020a056402350a00b00435df4430aamr38465413edd.403.1656947158542; Mon, 04 Jul 2022 08:05:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 17:05:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20220704150514.48816-1-elver@google.com> Message-Id: <20220704150514.48816-2-elver@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20220704150514.48816-1-elver@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.0.rc0.161.g10f37bed90-goog Subject: [PATCH v3 01/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Add KUnit test for constraints accounting From: Marco Elver To: elver@google.com, Peter Zijlstra , Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Dmitry Vyukov , Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Add KUnit test for hw_breakpoint constraints accounting, with various interesting mixes of breakpoint targets (some care was taken to catch interesting corner cases via bug-injection). The test cannot be built as a module because it requires access to hw_breakpoint_slots(), which is not inlinable or exported on all architectures. Signed-off-by: Marco Elver --- v3: * Don't use raw_smp_processor_id(). v2: * New patch. --- kernel/events/Makefile | 1 + kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c | 323 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ lib/Kconfig.debug | 10 + 3 files changed, 334 insertions(+) create mode 100644 kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c diff --git a/kernel/events/Makefile b/kernel/events/Makefile index 8591c180b52b..91a62f566743 100644 --- a/kernel/events/Makefile +++ b/kernel/events/Makefile @@ -2,4 +2,5 @@ obj-y := core.o ring_buffer.o callchain.o obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT) += hw_breakpoint.o +obj-$(CONFIG_HW_BREAKPOINT_KUNIT_TEST) += hw_breakpoint_test.o obj-$(CONFIG_UPROBES) += uprobes.o diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..433c5c45e2a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c @@ -0,0 +1,323 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * KUnit test for hw_breakpoint constraints accounting logic. + * + * Copyright (C) 2022, Google LLC. + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#define TEST_REQUIRES_BP_SLOTS(test, slots) \ + do { \ + if ((slots) > get_test_bp_slots()) { \ + kunit_skip((test), "Requires breakpoint slots: %d > %d", slots, \ + get_test_bp_slots()); \ + } \ + } while (0) + +#define TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(expr) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -ENOSPC, PTR_ERR(expr)) + +#define MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS 512 + +static char break_vars[MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS]; +static struct perf_event *test_bps[MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS]; +static struct task_struct *__other_task; + +static struct perf_event *register_test_bp(int cpu, struct task_struct *tsk, int idx) +{ + struct perf_event_attr attr = {}; + + if (WARN_ON(idx < 0 || idx >= MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS)) + return NULL; + + hw_breakpoint_init(&attr); + attr.bp_addr = (unsigned long)&break_vars[idx]; + attr.bp_len = HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1; + attr.bp_type = HW_BREAKPOINT_RW; + return perf_event_create_kernel_counter(&attr, cpu, tsk, NULL, NULL); +} + +static void unregister_test_bp(struct perf_event **bp) +{ + if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR(*bp))) + return; + if (WARN_ON(!*bp)) + return; + unregister_hw_breakpoint(*bp); + *bp = NULL; +} + +static int get_test_bp_slots(void) +{ + static int slots; + + if (!slots) + slots = hw_breakpoint_slots(TYPE_DATA); + + return slots; +} + +static void fill_one_bp_slot(struct kunit *test, int *id, int cpu, struct task_struct *tsk) +{ + struct perf_event *bp = register_test_bp(cpu, tsk, *id); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, bp); + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, IS_ERR(bp)); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, test_bps[*id]); + test_bps[(*id)++] = bp; +} + +/* + * Fills up the given @cpu/@tsk with breakpoints, only leaving @skip slots free. + * + * Returns true if this can be called again, continuing at @id. + */ +static bool fill_bp_slots(struct kunit *test, int *id, int cpu, struct task_struct *tsk, int skip) +{ + for (int i = 0; i < get_test_bp_slots() - skip; ++i) + fill_one_bp_slot(test, id, cpu, tsk); + + return *id + get_test_bp_slots() <= MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS; +} + +static int dummy_kthread(void *arg) +{ + return 0; +} + +static struct task_struct *get_other_task(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct task_struct *tsk; + + if (__other_task) + return __other_task; + + tsk = kthread_create(dummy_kthread, NULL, "hw_breakpoint_dummy_task"); + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, IS_ERR(tsk)); + __other_task = tsk; + return __other_task; +} + +static int get_test_cpu(int num) +{ + int cpu; + + WARN_ON(num < 0); + + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { + if (num-- <= 0) + break; + } + + return cpu; +} + +/* ===== Test cases ===== */ + +static void test_one_cpu(struct kunit *test) +{ + int idx = 0; + + fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL, 0); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx)); +} + +static void test_many_cpus(struct kunit *test) +{ + int idx = 0; + int cpu; + + /* Test that CPUs are independent. */ + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { + bool do_continue = fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, cpu, NULL, 0); + + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(cpu, NULL, idx)); + if (!do_continue) + break; + } +} + +static void test_one_task_on_all_cpus(struct kunit *test) +{ + int idx = 0; + + fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, current, 0); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx)); + /* Remove one and adding back CPU-target should work. */ + unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[0]); + fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL); +} + +static void test_two_tasks_on_all_cpus(struct kunit *test) +{ + int idx = 0; + + /* Test that tasks are independent. */ + fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, current, 0); + fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, get_other_task(test), 0); + + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, get_other_task(test), idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), get_other_task(test), idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx)); + /* Remove one from first task and adding back CPU-target should not work. */ + unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[0]); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx)); +} + +static void test_one_task_on_one_cpu(struct kunit *test) +{ + int idx = 0; + + fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current, 0); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx)); + /* + * Remove one and adding back CPU-target should work; this case is + * special vs. above because the task's constraints are CPU-dependent. + */ + unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[0]); + fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL); +} + +static void test_one_task_mixed(struct kunit *test) +{ + int idx = 0; + + TEST_REQUIRES_BP_SLOTS(test, 3); + + fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current); + fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, current, 1); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx)); + + /* Transition from CPU-dependent pinned count to CPU-independent. */ + unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[0]); + unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[1]); + fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL); + fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx)); +} + +static void test_two_tasks_on_one_cpu(struct kunit *test) +{ + int idx = 0; + + fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current, 0); + fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), get_other_task(test), 0); + + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, get_other_task(test), idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), get_other_task(test), idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx)); + /* Can still create breakpoints on some other CPU. */ + fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(1), NULL, 0); +} + +static void test_two_tasks_on_one_all_cpus(struct kunit *test) +{ + int idx = 0; + + fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current, 0); + fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, get_other_task(test), 0); + + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, get_other_task(test), idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), get_other_task(test), idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx)); + /* Cannot create breakpoints on some other CPU either. */ + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(1), NULL, idx)); +} + +static void test_task_on_all_and_one_cpu(struct kunit *test) +{ + int tsk_on_cpu_idx, cpu_idx; + int idx = 0; + + TEST_REQUIRES_BP_SLOTS(test, 3); + + fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, current, 2); + /* Transitioning from only all CPU breakpoints to mixed. */ + tsk_on_cpu_idx = idx; + fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current); + fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, -1, current); + + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx)); + + /* We should still be able to use up another CPU's slots. */ + cpu_idx = idx; + fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(1), NULL); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(1), NULL, idx)); + + /* Transitioning back to task target on all CPUs. */ + unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[tsk_on_cpu_idx]); + /* Still have a CPU target breakpoint in get_test_cpu(1). */ + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx)); + /* Remove it and try again. */ + unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[cpu_idx]); + fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, -1, current); + + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx)); + TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(1), NULL, idx)); +} + +static struct kunit_case hw_breakpoint_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(test_one_cpu), + KUNIT_CASE(test_many_cpus), + KUNIT_CASE(test_one_task_on_all_cpus), + KUNIT_CASE(test_two_tasks_on_all_cpus), + KUNIT_CASE(test_one_task_on_one_cpu), + KUNIT_CASE(test_one_task_mixed), + KUNIT_CASE(test_two_tasks_on_one_cpu), + KUNIT_CASE(test_two_tasks_on_one_all_cpus), + KUNIT_CASE(test_task_on_all_and_one_cpu), + {}, +}; + +static int test_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + /* Most test cases want 2 distinct CPUs. */ + return num_online_cpus() < 2 ? -EINVAL : 0; +} + +static void test_exit(struct kunit *test) +{ + for (int i = 0; i < MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS; ++i) { + if (test_bps[i]) + unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[i]); + } + + if (__other_task) { + kthread_stop(__other_task); + __other_task = NULL; + } +} + +static struct kunit_suite hw_breakpoint_test_suite = { + .name = "hw_breakpoint", + .test_cases = hw_breakpoint_test_cases, + .init = test_init, + .exit = test_exit, +}; + +kunit_test_suites(&hw_breakpoint_test_suite); + +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); +MODULE_AUTHOR("Marco Elver "); diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug index 2e24db4bff19..4c87a6edf046 100644 --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug @@ -2513,6 +2513,16 @@ config STACKINIT_KUNIT_TEST CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK, CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_BYREF, or CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_BYREF_ALL. +config HW_BREAKPOINT_KUNIT_TEST + bool "Test hw_breakpoint constraints accounting" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + depends on HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT + depends on KUNIT=y + default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + help + Tests for hw_breakpoint constraints accounting. + + If unsure, say N. + config TEST_UDELAY tristate "udelay test driver" help -- 2.37.0.rc0.161.g10f37bed90-goog