Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 21:43:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 21:43:14 -0500 Received: from mauve.demon.co.uk ([158.152.209.66]:6025 "EHLO mauve.demon.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 21:43:11 -0500 From: Ian Stirling Message-Id: <200112010242.CAA12521@mauve.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: Please tag tested releases of the 2.4.x kernel Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 02:42:02 +0000 (GMT) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011130171017.L504@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> from "Mike Fedyk" at Nov 30, 2001 05:10:17 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)@localhost.localdomain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 02:05:21AM +0100, willy tarreau wrote: > > I think that if even one tenth of the LKML > > subscribers rank their kernels at least once a week, > > we'll quickly see some stable and unusable kernels. > > > > I like this idea a lot. > > Who can get such a system up and running? Which web site? I've proposed in the past a more extensive version of this. make register or similar. Which you run, and it grabs a snapshot of system setup, optionally with comments, and sends it in to a registry. You can then do make comment and report issues. These would vary from "it crashes", to "my hard drive died/is dying" So we get information on systems, and some idea on which are reliable or not. Last time some people disagreed with this obviously brilliant idea. :/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/