Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Jernej =?utf-8?B?xaBrcmFiZWM=?= <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
        Emilio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?L=F3pez?= <emilio@elopez.com.ar>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Cc:     Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: sunxi: Limit legacy clocks to 32-bit ARM
Date:   Mon, 04 Jul 2022 22:05:57 +0200
Message-ID: <4196041.ejJDZkT8p0@kista>
In-Reply-To: <8956393.CDJkKcVGEf@jernej-laptop>
References: <20220702190135.51744-1-samuel@sholland.org> <8956393.CDJkKcVGEf@jernej-laptop>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Dne sobota, 02. julij 2022 ob 21:09:18 CEST je Jernej =C5=A0krabec napisal(=
a):
> Dne sobota, 02. julij 2022 ob 21:01:34 CEST je Samuel Holland napisal(a):
> > The sunxi legacy clocks were never compatible with any 64-bit SoC,
> > so there is no point in building them as part of a 64-bit ARM kernel.
> > They make even less sense being built in to a 64-bit RISC-V kernel.
> >=20
> > Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
>=20
> Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>

Applied both, thanks!
=20
Best regards,
Jernej