Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 5 Jul 2022 14:10:32 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc:     Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] OPP: Allow multiple clocks for a device
Message-ID: <20220705084032.stkoixfiotifivgm@vireshk-i7>
References: <cover.1654849214.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
 <8b29fa207024dc295639f9ba52c28e45782e3baa.1654849214.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
 <de13cca4-3a33-6482-7b02-f89796f45325@linaro.org>
 <4cac6c79-ea9a-1f48-c6f1-2e04b54590a4@linaro.org>
 <20220705065940.v3n2s7bgr6eai3rf@vireshk-i7>
 <20fdb316-0f7e-0a19-0b1d-70f2f8f7dad9@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20fdb316-0f7e-0a19-0b1d-70f2f8f7dad9@linaro.org>
Precedence: bulk

On 05-07-22, 10:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> I would say it is not different than existing opp-level property. To me
> it sounded fine, so at least one DT bindings maintainer would accept it. :)

:)

No one is stopping a user to use "level" here, just that I didn't
wanted to force it for everyone with multiple clocks. From a DT point
of view, we should be able to uniquely identify OPP nodes just based
on all freq values.

-- 
viresh