Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1656922179-21829-1-git-send-email-u0084500@gmail.com>
 <1656922179-21829-3-git-send-email-u0084500@gmail.com> <CAHp75VeNDnq+jszSZeU=Gx9cYzbrEo880QaBUOzSkoHDu5qKZw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADiBU3-mJeVyFT=RaXYbg+rX96nV6viC-zuL=ch1zeiOeUtPnA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHp75Vc-e+s94e=frhuEOJh0qYKME4kyJypHauqkgMZ7Umpfsg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75Vc-e+s94e=frhuEOJh0qYKME4kyJypHauqkgMZ7Umpfsg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 5 Jul 2022 11:09:39 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHp75VejXqbDJJAQTPHWzPyMZKEqggu387reXyUTiV1mASv9_w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] iio: adc: Add rtq6056 support
To:     ChiYuan Huang <u0084500@gmail.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
        cy_huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 11:08 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 4:17 AM ChiYuan Huang <u0084500@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> =E6=96=BC 2022=E5=B9=B47=E6=
=9C=885=E6=97=A5 =E9=80=B1=E4=BA=8C =E6=B8=85=E6=99=A85:18=E5=AF=AB=E9=81=
=93=EF=BC=9A
> > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 10:11 AM cy_huang <u0084500@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> First of all, please remove the noise in the replies and leave only
> the necessary context. Respect other mail readers / commenters. (In
> case you wonder why I didn't follow this rule when given my tag, this
> is done in a way that I cited full code to show explicitly on what I
> have given the tag).
>
> ...
>
> > > With a fixed kernel version (it may not be a stable version, we are
> > > now at v5.19 cycle, and it can't be either this cycle),
> > Do I need to submit  v4 with the latest kernel?
> > Any misunderstanding?

And a missed reply here.

It depends on the maintainer. I hope Jonathan can update the version
for you when applying.

> > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>

--=20
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko