Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <62c44b32.1c69fb81.c87b7.72ac@mx.google.com>
Date:   Tue, 5 Jul 2022 16:04:21 +0200
From:   Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Add ipq806x missing bindings
References: <20220705133917.8405-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
 <e84bb14b-a3a5-728d-e3a4-9d2e898a7aca@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e84bb14b-a3a5-728d-e3a4-9d2e898a7aca@linaro.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 04:28:47PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/07/2022 15:39, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > This series try to add some of the missing bindings for ipq806x.
> > 
> > This still lacks of the cpu bindings and all the bindings required
> > to scale cpu clk or L2. These will come later as the driver and
> > documentation require some changes.
> > 
> > So for now we try to add bindings that can directly applied without
> > making changes to any drivers.
> 
> You mention here and in subject bindings, but your patchset does not
> have any bindings.
>

What would be correct word? Node? Compatible?
Sorry for the confusion.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

-- 
	Ansuel