Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753232AbXE3AG6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2007 20:06:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750999AbXE3AGv (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2007 20:06:51 -0400 Received: from styx.suse.cz ([82.119.242.94]:57417 "EHLO mail.suse.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750904AbXE3AGu (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2007 20:06:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 02:10:53 +0200 (CEST) From: Jiri Kosina To: Renato Golin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: joydev.c and saitek cyborg evo force In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <200705210016.20794.dtor@insightbb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 932 Lines: 26 On Wed, 30 May 2007, Renato Golin wrote: > The HID sources are quite different from 2.6.21 and 2.6.20 but I don't > know how much was because Canonical guys and how much it really changed. > :( I will eventually put a Gentoo on my old laptop and try it for real, > sorry I couldn't be of much help now... Hi Renato, well I have changed the overall HID code design in 2.6.21 a little bit. Anyway, just hardcoding '#define DEBUG' and '#define DEBUG_DATA' (that's also important) in 2.6.20-and-older kernels should have similar result as CONFIG_HID_DEBUG in post-2.6.21. In your particular case, the DEBUG_DATA might really be more interesting. Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/