Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 5 Jul 2022 21:19:31 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To:     Conor Dooley <mail@conchuod.ie>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
        Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@wdc.com>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>,
        Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>,
        Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo@hahnjo.de>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] RISC-V: Add cpu-map topology information nodes
Message-ID: <20220705201931.nfwi5rlku7ykmydr@bogus>
References: <20220705190435.1790466-1-mail@conchuod.ie>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220705190435.1790466-1-mail@conchuod.ie>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 08:04:31PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> 
> It was reported to me that the Hive Unmatched incorrectly reports
> its topology to hwloc, but the StarFive VisionFive did in [0] &
> a subsequent off-list email from Brice (the hwloc maintainer).
> This turned out not to be entirely true, the /downstream/ version
> of the VisionFive does work correctly but not upstream, as the
> downstream devicetree has a cpu-map node that was added recently.
> 
> This series adds a cpu-map node to all upstream devicetrees, which
> I have tested on mpfs & fu540. The first patch is lifted directly
> from the downstream StarFive devicetree.
> 

Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

I would recommend to have sane defaults in core risc-v code in case of
absence of /cpu-map node as it is optional. The reason I mentioned is that
Conor mentioned how the default values in absence of the node looked quite
wrong. I don't know if it is possible on RISC-V but on ARM64 we do have
default values if arch_topology fails to set based on DT/ACPI.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep