Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1657038252-31360-1-git-send-email-u0084500@gmail.com>
 <1657038252-31360-3-git-send-email-u0084500@gmail.com> <CAHp75VeV6vByZXGLraLes+94Rfs23ZjPXGaXzUf-YY=sb_1=2Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADiBU38qzjECL9_8djx4Vna5PA=A2_jh7BFph1z2D_LOqTtZTQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADiBU38qzjECL9_8djx4Vna5PA=A2_jh7BFph1z2D_LOqTtZTQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 Jul 2022 14:45:13 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vct4YytjXmFVtqKEM6zK84=PsTDD7=y7mxjELjZMj845A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] iio: adc: Add rtq6056 support
To:     ChiYuan Huang <u0084500@gmail.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
        cy_huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 3:08 AM ChiYuan Huang <u0084500@gmail.com> wrote:
> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> =E6=96=BC 2022=E5=B9=B47=E6=
=9C=886=E6=97=A5 =E9=80=B1=E4=B8=89 =E5=87=8C=E6=99=A83:09=E5=AF=AB=E9=81=
=93=EF=BC=9A
> > On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 6:31 PM cy_huang <u0084500@gmail.com> wrote:

...

> > > +KernelVersion: 5.15.31
> >
> > ^^^ Wrong
> >
> I really cannot understand what kernel version I need to specified.
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHp75VeBdgbyDQXEYb9ZZdi3AU=3DvPw6aKGWbNLnuA=
_QoN4LE4A@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Last time, my understanding is to use the realistic kernel version.
> Then from my  development environment, the kernel  I used is 5.15.31.
> That's why I changed it from '5.18.2' to '5.15.31'.
>
> Do you mind to tell me what kernel version I need to write for this
> ABI test document?
> I'm almost confused about 'realistic', 'non-stable', nor 'developing'.
>
> If to write '5.19' or the future version '5.20', is it ok?

It's as simple as "next version that most likely your patch will be
in", in 99.9% cases it's 'current-cycle-version + 1', i.e. 5.20.

--=20
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko