Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <36a68a0b-0c18-deb5-609c-2128aa3fc21f@somainline.org>
Date:   Wed, 6 Jul 2022 15:31:55 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] ARM: dts: qcom: disable smb208 regulators for
 ipq8064-rb3011
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>
References: <20220705133917.8405-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
 <20220705133917.8405-5-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
 <8a394fa3-92fb-d162-b4ee-df010a09aed0@somainline.org>
 <62c58a60.1c69fb81.25b26.e72a@mx.google.com>
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
In-Reply-To: <62c58a60.1c69fb81.25b26.e72a@mx.google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 6.07.2022 14:56, Christian Marangi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 03:03:32PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5.07.2022 15:39, Christian Marangi wrote:
>>> Mikrotik RB3011 have a special configuration where the regulators are
>>> not the common smb208 controlled by RPM but they use a TPS563900
>>> controlled via i2c. Disable the smb208 for this specific device.
>> Ok, so that answers my question from the previous email.
>> Please define the SMB208 regulators only in the DTs of
>> boards that actually use it, as it is not a SoC component as
>> far as I can tell.
>>
>> Konrad
> 
> This was already discuessed,
Yeah sorry, I didn't notice earlier and started reviewing patches
that were already reviewed by others.


rb3011 is the exception, qcom for ipq8064
> recommends to use smb208 but gives the option to implement it in their
> own way. So again we have 28 device with smb208 and 1 device that use
> its own special way...
> 
> Wonder if a separate dtsi can be used for this if we really can't put
> smb208 in ipq8064 dtsi?
There's msm8916-pm8916.dtsi. You can follow.

Konrad

[...]