Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <6b61116a-0465-9687-33bf-9b36f0ef90cb@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 6 Jul 2022 16:46:16 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] ARM: dts: qcom: add smem node for ipq8064
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>
References: <20220705133917.8405-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
 <20220705133917.8405-10-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
 <c5bf6246-a350-8a87-71bc-bc13d502a8af@linaro.org>
 <62c56477.1c69fb81.8ec4c.f1ac@mx.google.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <62c56477.1c69fb81.8ec4c.f1ac@mx.google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 06/07/2022 12:14, Christian Marangi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 10:39:16AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 05/07/2022 15:39, Christian Marangi wrote:
>>> Add missing smem node for ipq8064.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
>>> Tested-by: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi
>>> index b5aede3d7ccf..98527a7d885e 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi
>>> @@ -908,6 +908,11 @@ lcc: clock-controller@28000000 {
>>>  			#reset-cells = <1>;
>>>  		};
>>>  
>>> +		sfpb_mutex_block: syscon@1200600 {
>>> +			compatible = "syscon";
>>
>> syscon alone is not allowed.
>>
> 
> Mh... This is problematic. How this should be handled?

As usual - add specific compatible.

Maybe I was not specific enough, but my commit was under compatible, not
under device node, so it seems obvious. Just in case it is not obvious -
you cannot have "syscon" compatible alone.


Best regards,
Krzysztof