Received: by 2002:ad5:4acb:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n11csp2866433imw; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 13:07:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vFQrN+MHW7vqRHOpBA2BwHe1yWCZM7Qbhatu/FAxnAiLBGUt+AHOgI4jXHl0B8FbI5rb2q X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e850:b0:16a:209a:971a with SMTP id t16-20020a170902e85000b0016a209a971amr49492826plg.163.1657138036477; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 13:07:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1657138036; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=iKq/pOXGWZu/VEdaF+tHsGS3xMR41tLayT4rcBlgbtlsJwLVhX6tt1BMsjdT7izwuc wwmEDE3N8MxOY1GESeEAHtpzzd3nuRNZ4Jb16vf1L9C33TywfEBsZnhW+UOKbEIqFP3b HuxZlCrdUBCWCeNQdxfGv+17Ank32YA9NoKqMD5vP7pJ6dB6YlEVFUiN2FXJpStbm2E8 X40o0BTUpYxKBLgQHJJK2AGWkp70v0itY5WHFW6CrNkTimoVzWoFo7C5y8z4p0nlFx1X AzPjX8IVAkzp254vWay7JFWlvfUnHt5dKTbX66JvIUfTMgzZDhoAi4dbEhL51yPs9xSY k7iA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=VKmMBf94dqxoTjWi2eeMymoq1+LEzz8Mcbmk6X430xs=; b=wiWvrjbCl3T3cfyquQL93583rdO/Ed8UbcNj3lpl6gQ3X24xwoJgIEG2bf+VhdTjuP TTTgbKMz6KUmQ1rXIpw3N74zDrnzI+4mRKiddJYiRXwC53mTIb6IYDxN4SkBWAL2oEby lQZZ3qm6LcCEdE/wziWSXoW9hhMDdv40ECVQSy/JqYlR+u70j2FCy2MadszzeHmXlEo6 5tY/nTft6tWwIbd5q6G3B6QhOuT+sTeMhY7I6Q4UoKubVPeUAbmixQC2EFcomaXdHbSK 8nd4Wm89kU2GwXxW1RF5NA69UZ4gA9XenvOKPePwS+SZUwtssqED3WAGYdMXlBs5PTFk hdFA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=QPubt1Ja; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e4-20020a170902744400b00168f0eeb660si2686728plt.436.2022.07.06.13.07.01; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 13:07:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=QPubt1Ja; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233563AbiGFToy (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 6 Jul 2022 15:44:54 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38230 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232499AbiGFTow (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2022 15:44:52 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com (mail-ed1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39F6FDFE7 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 12:44:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id n8so20603645eda.0 for ; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 12:44:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VKmMBf94dqxoTjWi2eeMymoq1+LEzz8Mcbmk6X430xs=; b=QPubt1JaNqnaKlW47bNlowu/ISfn+jldi2xTy+EQoJxWPeFKU1fXtIqSlnaQ8geZHU MyvpCrrdhsuyiSBK+8oQiezGplmIzd1ibjpsPY7r1nTUJDsIiNTYLER5QwE1NLeFpA19 iIrvQWcpJT0nLE+z508HT85iQwzfr5pljAOsy8D3idure2AMS1yrkyPmGOnTiRJnbR6y vfsitWxWiyV9kh0Z2Y/7UcBx17U28/UW7p9TCdRqChlAdRXvP9StjGp8cyWAWpSj1e8/ ew2J8IUH9SX1FwlSZno2E428zLDu8QV6+yZB/5ZGOSQUFVF0oD3aERzIAc8AfrqM2KlO 3h2w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VKmMBf94dqxoTjWi2eeMymoq1+LEzz8Mcbmk6X430xs=; b=Nad6tzOscSW4lEjV7M3liZu9lvkdjVEp06UJ3CYTvWCOc7wYIhq1KQNQz4V4C581W/ pYDR7mwxMHov2poFncJV4mCnuRXd/RFMCJd+ykye1avjRk9gTidoy3NcdEXCt6r0F6r/ 57NDil7az0y6x1hCeUrjhKnkzk5Gpu0iRr12ByjjPhxMCgMCMJFEjWT4Ol2iP05T/Fd1 pZWJX6HIkWf3YXMq2vyYo/uR4Kh0A4n9eAPD0KHpmnAOre3JNT7sh2qdFRPhOHdlg3Zk 9IVJNfJwgdMoKLUbeZqVu4n2yMmsk3rtJefIQQoiFipyJXSMmE3p1sfHnCDQ4sIMbwC1 aqoQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+A+3mRiGDL1nhjeYP7Qj+JoB1U64KHQpkTaPESXx8DaIIQ3YSB jzGH3bdOA8SM+vdaLrQZfY0hrTiLHfTkMwi6V+qgWA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:43c4:b0:43a:6309:6c9b with SMTP id p4-20020a05640243c400b0043a63096c9bmr22725476edc.91.1657136689614; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 12:44:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220518073232.526443-1-davidgow@google.com> In-Reply-To: <20220518073232.526443-1-davidgow@google.com> From: Brendan Higgins Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 15:44:38 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kunit: tool: Add x86_64-smp architecture for SMP testing To: David Gow Cc: Daniel Latypov , Marco Elver , Shuah Khan , Dmitry Vyukov , kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 3:32 AM 'David Gow' via KUnit Development wrote: > > Add a new QEMU config for kunit_tool, x86_64-smp, which provides an > 8-cpu SMP setup. No other kunit_tool configurations provide an SMP > setup, so this is the best bet for testing things like KCSAN, which > require a multicore/multi-cpu system. > > The choice of 8 CPUs is pretty arbitrary: it's enough to get tests like > KCSAN to run with a nontrivial number of worker threads, while still > working relatively quickly on older machines. > > Signed-off-by: David Gow I know there is some discussion on this patch, but I think this patch is good as implemented; we could always delete this config if we change our policies later. Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins