Received: by 2002:ad5:4acb:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n11csp3011426imw; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 15:55:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1u//HaUQXRrDU/ZpwprGfWyW12q/J2N+r6uLH1+ERxcixBa6s/hxwZU5w10QagRPrZGXXM3 X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:87b0:b0:72a:a14e:106d with SMTP id qv48-20020a17090787b000b0072aa14e106dmr26054075ejc.167.1657148154119; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 15:55:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1657148154; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qUefVcT5WKIWzzEeZ5ttC5EZo7R/ThCVr9CKYhhMjXJD1FcHZcQVO7ZQ6K4myeGUfL N7iZGVTf2QXIUEqlQY+gnXInINu7qoPqxH31nfn/Ho9prcAlzsG5oiAi8viNJGLmG+eK SuZGmxgIOqRO4p1u7PY8UiFTCLEvgrg7beDydAwUGVx/o1EwPIq8FjjeXWfuNJVomd2Q wA8mFVkaljDNbsST+FNXBqKZhXThckCeJqL9tnUgr7BA5b8es/fGp9efytO8OPnBFVGJ jwhPwZBbOVjmMGjfJeEvkTjFvTfCSsDPPAQokx1u7dH4uBSDyalznMAYRseNfQzxDJgI CZQw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:robot-unsubscribe :robot-id:message-id:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:cc:subject :to:reply-to:sender:from:dkim-signature:dkim-signature:date; bh=m1d6tssk1qKROgDUlojal0QK0+AWMxs+toYm3o4QLIE=; b=saNph6FpcJa7aCckD9eEDk1de+Dz603R2xbDd43ZRJSrxBFspzekoaK1n5zWzswZ02 kjOR6T6EtiXqqL6Ti7qyWHmNVxmpulytCSfNZLare2UmSQWJne6LfWGTuJu4q24HTs3l Vw6s7a7FV9kXzcikgu7L47Y4sBJPDGrsHRhUpS/J+UvhkQ8L5LW2okW819W89NI0z9jz RrH+5xg4TxquF9FlbPqAAAwzC99mC3NEefMBpkFiwT4yCZJNFT1X8dKJ7XrSY2HKKPai vfao4q2TVKRtGS5yKGErZ6Vgh01iQBSehAIPKhzGflTmEWpIDMNIyokVpjOhf3ZrBY4m 1uRA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=pXqCJ8F8; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b10-20020a056402084a00b0042b38b9202dsi8664508edz.568.2022.07.06.15.55.29; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 15:55:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=pXqCJ8F8; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233133AbiGFWdK (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 6 Jul 2022 18:33:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37714 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231529AbiGFWdJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2022 18:33:09 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08D9E14D17; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 15:33:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2022 22:33:03 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1657146785; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=m1d6tssk1qKROgDUlojal0QK0+AWMxs+toYm3o4QLIE=; b=pXqCJ8F856WDnrMSzbfyIBP6n7vAKVRVAhbgv9wDsxDMYlQVSvq5QGDXKaX8H1b5BnVYBK gV2tPJu3/LQKKof4ZMxCdFWMNH1gOIn8bAi2n9D5zjhMFQLEcAdU0OEXO3Zdq9OcZynlab 7rm0MELUH5ITOuyqfIDeJQjz0sgn6DAeMAn4QfAtViGoQb/+vO/T/1t1bIMc4La9XRISnK 2k6qr+GOGfTzCL4sqGe1aQejUNsif4/xIay98CB4//toaZ4zme/IJ8NOte4Q4u9yG6IKMk 78vXlGqyzrot9vygzj54CMpErQyd4+6Eg4dUMsszepaId5YEd6reyCOM0VdAzA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1657146785; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=m1d6tssk1qKROgDUlojal0QK0+AWMxs+toYm3o4QLIE=; b=L6GaqmRhSIkyvG2pXZFW8w3/5QxnlYw6VyPiSz0Wahm4rXXl5NVFdAMvuXZMBZ4lBH/jRp 9OhaX1vhw+DFOlBQ== From: "tip-bot2 for Nathan Chancellor" Sender: tip-bot2@linutronix.de Reply-to: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: [tip: x86/build] x86/Kconfig: Fix CONFIG_CC_HAS_SANE_STACKPROTECTOR when cross compiling with clang Cc: Nathan Chancellor , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20220617180845.2788442-1-nathan@kernel.org> References: <20220617180845.2788442-1-nathan@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <165714678380.15455.941309204578354056.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> Robot-ID: Robot-Unsubscribe: Contact to get blacklisted from these emails Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The following commit has been merged into the x86/build branch of tip: Commit-ID: b230402b0dbd6930a616a07641f0bbc30325881e Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/b230402b0dbd6930a616a07641f0bbc30325881e Author: Nathan Chancellor AuthorDate: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 11:08:46 -07:00 Committer: Dave Hansen CommitterDate: Wed, 06 Jul 2022 14:57:10 -07:00 x86/Kconfig: Fix CONFIG_CC_HAS_SANE_STACKPROTECTOR when cross compiling with clang Chimera Linux notes that CONFIG_CC_HAS_SANE_STACKPROTECTOR cannot be enabled when cross compiling an x86_64 kernel with clang, even though it does work when natively compiling. When building on aarch64: $ make -sj"$(nproc)" ARCH=x86_64 LLVM=1 defconfig $ grep STACKPROTECTOR .config When building on x86_64: $ make -sj"$(nproc)" ARCH=x86_64 LLVM=1 defconfig $ grep STACKPROTECTOR .config CONFIG_CC_HAS_SANE_STACKPROTECTOR=y CONFIG_HAVE_STACKPROTECTOR=y CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=y CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG=y When clang is invoked without a '--target' flag, code is generated for the default target, which is usually the host (it is configurable via cmake). As a result, the has-stack-protector scripts will generate code for the default target but check for x86 specific segment registers, which cannot succeed if the default target is not x86. $(CLANG_FLAGS) contains an explicit '--target' flag so pass that variable along to the has-stack-protector scripts so that the stack protector can be enabled when cross compiling with clang. The 32-bit stack protector cannot currently be enabled with clang, as it does not support '-mstack-protector-guard-symbol', so this results in no functional change for ARCH=i386 when cross compiling. Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Link: https://github.com/chimera-linux/cports/commit/0fb7e506d5f83fdf2104feb22cdac34934561226 Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/48553 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220617180845.2788442-1-nathan@kernel.org --- arch/x86/Kconfig | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index b0142e0..b7767ba 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig @@ -386,8 +386,8 @@ config PGTABLE_LEVELS config CC_HAS_SANE_STACKPROTECTOR bool - default $(success,$(srctree)/scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh $(CC)) if 64BIT - default $(success,$(srctree)/scripts/gcc-x86_32-has-stack-protector.sh $(CC)) + default $(success,$(srctree)/scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh $(CC) $(CLANG_FLAGS)) if 64BIT + default $(success,$(srctree)/scripts/gcc-x86_32-has-stack-protector.sh $(CC) $(CLANG_FLAGS)) help We have to make sure stack protector is unconditionally disabled if the compiler produces broken code or if it does not let us control