Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 6 Jul 2022 21:53:45 -0500
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To:     Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] hwspinlock: qcom: Add support for mmio usage to
 sfpb-mutex
Message-ID: <YsZKuUAc2iHWg9kN@builder.lan>
References: <20220707013017.26654-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220707013017.26654-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed 06 Jul 20:30 CDT 2022, Christian Marangi wrote:

> Allow sfpb-mutex to use mmio in addition to syscon.
> 

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>

> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
> index 364710966665..23c913095bd0 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,11 @@
>  #define QCOM_MUTEX_APPS_PROC_ID	1
>  #define QCOM_MUTEX_NUM_LOCKS	32
>  
> +struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data {
> +	u32 offset;
> +	u32 stride;
> +};
> +
>  static int qcom_hwspinlock_trylock(struct hwspinlock *lock)
>  {
>  	struct regmap_field *field = lock->priv;
> @@ -63,9 +68,20 @@ static const struct hwspinlock_ops qcom_hwspinlock_ops = {
>  	.unlock		= qcom_hwspinlock_unlock,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data of_sfpb_mutex = {
> +	.offset = 0x4,
> +	.stride = 0x4,
> +};
> +
> +/* All modern platform has offset 0 and stride of 4k */
> +static const struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data of_tcsr_mutex = {
> +	.offset = 0,
> +	.stride = 0x1000,
> +};
> +
>  static const struct of_device_id qcom_hwspinlock_of_match[] = {
> -	{ .compatible = "qcom,sfpb-mutex" },
> -	{ .compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex" },
> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,sfpb-mutex", .data = &of_sfpb_mutex },
> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex", .data = &of_tcsr_mutex },
>  	{ }
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_hwspinlock_of_match);
> @@ -101,7 +117,7 @@ static struct regmap *qcom_hwspinlock_probe_syscon(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  	return regmap;
>  }
>  
> -static const struct regmap_config tcsr_mutex_config = {
> +static const struct regmap_config qcom_hwspinlock_mmio_config = {

Any objections against me skipping this rename when applying the patch?
Just to keep the patch to the point?

Regards,
Bjorn

>  	.reg_bits		= 32,
>  	.reg_stride		= 4,
>  	.val_bits		= 32,
> @@ -112,18 +128,20 @@ static const struct regmap_config tcsr_mutex_config = {
>  static struct regmap *qcom_hwspinlock_probe_mmio(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  						 u32 *offset, u32 *stride)
>  {
> +	const struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data *data;
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	void __iomem *base;
>  
> -	/* All modern platform has offset 0 and stride of 4k */
> -	*offset = 0;
> -	*stride = 0x1000;
> +	data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> +
> +	*offset = data->offset;
> +	*stride = data->stride;
>  
>  	base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
>  	if (IS_ERR(base))
>  		return ERR_CAST(base);
>  
> -	return devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, base, &tcsr_mutex_config);
> +	return devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, base, &qcom_hwspinlock_mmio_config);
>  }
>  
>  static int qcom_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> -- 
> 2.36.1
>