Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 7 Jul 2022 11:22:06 +0200
From:   Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
To:     Hongchen Zhang <zhanghongchen@loongson.cn>
Cc:     linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: fix pmd_mkinvalid
Message-ID: <20220707092206.GA9894@alpha.franken.de>
References: <1657181495-33004-1-git-send-email-zhanghongchen@loongson.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1657181495-33004-1-git-send-email-zhanghongchen@loongson.cn>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 04:11:35PM +0800, Hongchen Zhang wrote:
> When a pmd entry is invalidated by pmd_mkinvalid,pmd_present should
> return true.
> So introduce a _PMD_PRESENT_INVALID_SHIFT bit to check if a pmd is
> present but invalidated by pmd_mkinvalid.

What problem are you trying to fix ? What are the symptoms ?

> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

the test robot showed problems with your last version of the patch,
which hasn't been integrated into at least the MIPS tree, so no
need to that.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]