Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 8 Jul 2022 14:00:36 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
        Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>,
        Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
        linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
        Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
        Till Harbaum <till@harbaum.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] i2c: Introduce i2c_str_read_write() and make use
 of it
Message-ID: <YsgcZHzjzqyJjKqQ@shikoro>
Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
        Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>,
        Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
        linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
        Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
        Till Harbaum <till@harbaum.org>
References: <20220703154232.55549-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <20220703154232.55549-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <YsWI4nzQa9gmqKdw@shikoro>
 <YsgBkDeq/KeQ15HU@smile.fi.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Sq82JupuAgPLDLmZ"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YsgBkDeq/KeQ15HU@smile.fi.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk


--Sq82JupuAgPLDLmZ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline


> Just noticed yet another (but not in the category of the above) debug message
> [1]. Would it be acceptable to use patch 1 from this series and its use in (a
> completely new) patch 2?

Well, it falls into the first category because we also have a tracepoint
for smbus_xfer :)


--Sq82JupuAgPLDLmZ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=JOUV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sq82JupuAgPLDLmZ--