Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 8 Jul 2022 19:33:04 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@9elements.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] dt-bindings: regulator: add bindings for
 output-supply
Message-ID: <Ysh4YOG1czB8gfpm@sirena.org.uk>
References: <20220707081826.953449-1-Naresh.Solanki@9elements.com>
 <20220707081826.953449-3-Naresh.Solanki@9elements.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JuMWJVyYHide4JUv"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220707081826.953449-3-Naresh.Solanki@9elements.com>
Precedence: bulk


--JuMWJVyYHide4JUv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 10:18:24AM +0200, Naresh Solanki wrote:
> Add a devicetree binding for the 9elements,output-supply driver.
> Example is also provided.

It's fine this time but in general if you're sending a patch series you
should always ensure that at least the cover letter goes to all the
relevant maintainers so that they know what's going on with
dependencies.

--JuMWJVyYHide4JUv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmLIeF8ACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9DlWgf/bcNS49QAdGVXw97/3ygujRnBrNxYUXXbxTHg6pQO7IXHeXH8+dj1fVwK
+HMRIbM61XBH65km4ZPPDyn7pjp+WRdnULx1kseTw2wuwuZcbLqu5dv2e+qwwdr1
3yOWLOgyugtlkGcX71iFnHGRapffVJnFP3FiphcDCJ7ftv0r/uHCcf9RQn31WLZF
j0v58Fx36LhKMPzfZAogmvaDOk+mhTNeISSmBzjc0HQlpXeKzDFr2F4Bbxk7ep/p
yNTs/xZlbbY73gb1DMVRzywneOSXJu65gD+nO26Lb/OqbzWNeyScAy7250N4rGLy
3xiWNFFyT00m8y/AnSUgWR+Ci/c6Rg==
=FKXo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--JuMWJVyYHide4JUv--