Received: by 2002:ad5:4acb:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n11csp978734imw; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 15:45:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1s0glFUUyM19akpjdP6vDmds7nL9muncPzR4nzDmOLuMJKGnSXsPunjUjFEbpCtpfmSpOUM X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:5518:b0:43a:9e32:b6fc with SMTP id fi24-20020a056402551800b0043a9e32b6fcmr7982957edb.252.1657320336119; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 15:45:36 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1657320336; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=D8aM82gTlczYpXtffy05/Ltk/b5/7muNjkhKyPEPpmI5kQ+zT88+U1bq1qn3gZD5O7 FtWqoa6hNv7WwDmrRUhjZvyjVGiEIoO5EKOGpWAZybYNmhxBVCaXBnqwFFeJrKWeeoM6 p3TysiwODjo3gVUoe5VPb2xjynhWwpOf5vPWlNBUl15zwhw0gfaR7Pmp1Bxk6vxVgivX lxl4Brh8GvCk/4RGDB1KzxcPMH/8fEpqMSirpxptCCUkvpVhVvnfGQklYy8zvSEs+L4o SLMSPhiLgCT/nmkYKe4dMRtHNeNl1JJCq8+bScjle0yrwt0EdUwKO2n/AjJ7DVKuUFtu g3lQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:subject:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from; bh=ot3nDa3z+iq8PTAdH+Oxh+X7IW7oF9fw0UFEKogt0tQ=; b=N5MHgoGKX+ujJzLPJhuonM8sMtX0Fb1KRzGkqXWE8QSN7pP0gev4iZZG82ttDoB4kr i9OENVQ/aQyK7TL533LISwEG0o0Bm3qbxyJcP6uKxWleZUI15GD1KxPw2KLVx+dJXisL 9IhCU50I7/zL9biVC/KVpAGxnWo0JalJ9mwtoPWr0a3nCAIQ5Z1UU09FEJwoy/u+AKMR J9oYGonIQ6Se6RUrc2d031QE2hVZYV1zoPjGM/zppbUMiHTHZ8/St16tEf+0GqrMqYWX JxhbOisbbFWkKXcIhRw0RbX3KXYimakLDOKG1xl0k0t7y9es2LJ1+e61LM4opjQ6joG/ ZBmw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p8-20020a05640243c800b0043a493da62esi4884945edc.537.2022.07.08.15.45.11; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 15:45:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237975AbiGHWZn (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 8 Jul 2022 18:25:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49450 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237684AbiGHWZl (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2022 18:25:41 -0400 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com (out01.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.231]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CD0FA2E61 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 15:25:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]:59826) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1o9wPq-004o3a-Ov; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 16:25:38 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-174-4.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.174.4]:43408 helo=email.froward.int.ebiederm.org.xmission.com) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1o9wPp-00AEXn-O8; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 16:25:38 -0600 From: "Eric W. Biederman" To: Keno Fischer Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, bigeasy@linutronix.de, Peter Zijlstra , Jann Horn , Kees Cook , Alexander Gordeev , Robert O'Callahan , Kyle Huey , Oleg Nesterov References: <20220421150248.667412396@infradead.org> <20220421150654.817117821@infradead.org> <87czhap9dy.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <878rrrh32q.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <87k0b7v9yk.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <87k0b0apne.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <87a6bv6dl6.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <87r13gd4xy.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2022 17:25:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87r13gd4xy.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:43:37 -0500") Message-ID: <87edyvgs2s.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1o9wPp-00AEXn-O8;;;mid=<87edyvgs2s.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.174.4;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=softfail X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1/stSDpTvjFDPy2IhraphYlslMz8o/ejjI= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.174.4 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ****;Keno Fischer X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 454 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.05 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 13 (2.8%), b_tie_ro: 11 (2.4%), parse: 1.23 (0.3%), extract_message_metadata: 15 (3.3%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.23 (0.3%), tests_pri_-1000: 19 (4.1%), tests_pri_-950: 1.60 (0.4%), tests_pri_-900: 1.22 (0.3%), tests_pri_-90: 173 (38.1%), check_bayes: 171 (37.6%), b_tokenize: 7 (1.5%), b_tok_get_all: 7 (1.6%), b_comp_prob: 2.6 (0.6%), b_tok_touch_all: 150 (33.0%), b_finish: 1.15 (0.3%), tests_pri_0: 208 (46.0%), check_dkim_signature: 0.88 (0.2%), check_dkim_adsp: 3.6 (0.8%), poll_dns_idle: 1.41 (0.3%), tests_pri_10: 4.4 (1.0%), tests_pri_500: 14 (3.0%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ptrace: Stop supporting SIGKILL for PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Eric W. Biederman" writes: > Recently I had a conversation where it was pointed out to me that > SIGKILL sent to a tracee stropped in PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT is quite > difficult for a tracer to handle. > > Keeping SIGKILL working for anything after the process has been killed > is also a real pain from an implementation point of view. > > So I am attempting to remove this wart in the userspace API and see > if anyone cares. > > Eric W. Biederman (3): > signal: Ensure SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT gets set in do_group_exit > signal: Guarantee that SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT is set on process exit > signal: Drop signals received after a fatal signal has been processed > > fs/coredump.c | 2 +- > include/linux/sched/signal.h | 1 + > kernel/exit.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- > kernel/fork.c | 2 ++ > kernel/signal.c | 3 ++- > 5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) RR folks any comments? Did I properly understand what Keno Fischer was asking for when we talked in person? Eric