Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 8 Jul 2022 23:25:10 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>,
        Yixun Lan <dlan@gentoo.org>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V/bpf: Enable bpf_probe_read{, str}()
Message-ID: <YskfRqDqmNhGcuVF@infradead.org>
References: <20220703130924.57240-1-dlan@gentoo.org>
 <YsKAZUJRo5cjtZ3n@infradead.org>
 <CAEf4BzbCswMd6KU7f9SEU6xHBBPu_rTL5f+KE0OkYj63e-h-bA@mail.gmail.com>
 <YsUy8jBpt11zoc5E@infradead.org>
 <CAEf4BzZrvOyYxmJpw=azZ59adeEqnHYqnUXKQProyUKBP5NaUA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzZrvOyYxmJpw=azZ59adeEqnHYqnUXKQProyUKBP5NaUA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 03:22:51PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 12:00 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 10:00:42PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > > riscv existed as of [0], so I'd argue it is a proper bug fix, as
> > > corresponding select ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE should
> > > have been added back then.
> >
> > How much of an eBPF ecosystem was there on RISC-V at the point?
> 
> No idea, never used RISC-V and didn't pay much attention. But why does
> it matter?

It matters because we should not spread broken legacy interfaces.