Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of amd.com designates
 165.204.84.17 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
 client-ip=165.204.84.17; helo=SATLEXMB04.amd.com; pr=C
From:   Perry Yuan <Perry.Yuan@amd.com>
To:     <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>, <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        <Ray.Huang@amd.com>
CC:     <Deepak.Sharma@amd.com>, <Mario.Limonciello@amd.com>,
        <Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com>, <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>,
        <Jinzhou.Su@amd.com>, <Xinmei.Huang@amd.com>,
        <Xiaojian.Du@amd.com>, <Li.Meng@amd.com>,
        <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Perry Yuan <Perry.Yuan@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 13/14] arch_topology: remove the acpi_disabled check
Date:   Sat, 9 Jul 2022 10:20:19 -0400
Message-ID: <20220709142019.836919-1-Perry.Yuan@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jul 2022 14:20:33.1734
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 1e772275-84cb-4f1a-7965-08da61b62f60
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d;Ip=[165.204.84.17];Helo=[SATLEXMB04.amd.com]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN8NAM11FT038.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SA1PR12MB5638
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
        DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
        RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE
        autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

"acpi_cpc_valid" function already includes the acpi_disabled check and we can
remove the duplicated check here

Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <Perry.Yuan@amd.com>
---
 drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
index 579c851a2bd7..73a8cb31529d 100644
--- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ void topology_init_cpu_capacity_cppc(void)
 	struct cppc_perf_caps perf_caps;
 	int cpu;
 
-	if (likely(acpi_disabled || !acpi_cpc_valid()))
+	if (likely(!acpi_cpc_valid()))
 		return;
 
 	raw_capacity = kcalloc(num_possible_cpus(), sizeof(*raw_capacity),
-- 
2.25.1