Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 1 Dec 2001 04:45:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 1 Dec 2001 04:45:32 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:50440 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 1 Dec 2001 04:45:24 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove BKL from drivers' release functions To: ricklind@us.ibm.com (Rick Lindsley) Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 09:52:57 +0000 (GMT) Cc: viro@math.psu.edu (Alexander Viro), dave@sr71.net (David C. Hansen), alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200112010047.fB10lA406654@eng4.beaverton.ibm.com> from "Rick Lindsley" at Nov 30, 2001 04:47:10 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > opens, we CAN announce we are closer, and nothing else will be any more > broken than it was before we started. As I said in an earlier post (and > I don't think anybody disagrees): this is an incremental task. Any This is why we have a development tree. Its moving things in the right direction which is important. I suspect many drivers will want to use semaphores rather than atomic counts however, to ensure that an open doesn't complete while a previous release is still shutting down hardware Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/