Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <9ce8aa53-ed70-823f-3410-1f50d5b902c9@redhat.com>
Date:   Sun, 10 Jul 2022 21:57:13 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.8.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Two fixes for IFS
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "Joseph, Jithu" <jithu.joseph@intel.com>, markgross@kernel.org,
        ashok.raj@intel.com, ravi.v.shankar@intel.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
        patches@lists.linux.dev
References: <c416b93b-8adc-d9a8-ef0d-594cce6d9a9d@redhat.com>
 <20220710182521.60642-1-tony.luck@intel.com>
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220710182521.60642-1-tony.luck@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Tony,

On 7/10/22 20:25, Tony Luck wrote:
> Hans ... if you are pushing to Linus to add "BROKEN", then could
> you include these two patches to make it fractionally less broken?

Since the driver is going to be marked as BROKEN now anyways,
I don't see much value in getting these send last minute to Linus.

At this point in the kernel cycle (rc6 will be out in a couple
of hours likely) we really should avoid churn as much as possible.

Regards,

Hans