Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 1 Dec 2001 05:02:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 1 Dec 2001 05:02:22 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:59656 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 1 Dec 2001 05:02:16 -0500 Subject: Re: Linux/Pro [was Re: Coding style - a non-issue] To: lm@bitmover.com (Larry McVoy) Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 10:09:30 +0000 (GMT) Cc: davidel@xmailserver.org (Davide Libenzi), lm@bitmover.com (Larry McVoy), akpm@zip.com.au (Andrew Morton), phillips@bonn-fries.net (Daniel Phillips), hps@intermeta.de (Henning Schmiedehausen), jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com (Jeff Garzik), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011130171510.B19152@work.bitmover.com> from "Larry McVoy" at Nov 30, 2001 05:15:10 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Wasn't it you that were saying that Linux will never scale with more than > > 2 CPUs ? > > No, that wasn't me. I said it shouldn't scale beyond 4 cpus. I'd be pretty > lame if I said it couldn't scale with more than 2. Should != could. Question: What happens when people stick 8 threads of execution on a die with a single L2 cache ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/