Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 11 Jul 2022 11:21:16 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@microchip.com>,
        Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
        Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>,
        katie.morris@in-advantage.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 net-next 0/9] add support for VSC7512 control over
 SPI
Message-ID: <20220711112116.2f931390@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <YsvWh8YJGeJNbQFB@google.com>
References: <20220705204743.3224692-1-colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
        <20220708200918.131c0950@kernel.org>
        <YsvWh8YJGeJNbQFB@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 08:51:35 +0100 Lee Jones wrote:
> > Can this go into net-next if there are no more complains over the
> > weekend? Anyone still planning to review?  
> 
> As the subsystem with the fewest changes, I'm not sure why it would.

Yeah, just going by the tag in the subject. I have no preference,
looks like it applies cleanly to Linus'.

> I'd planed to route this in via MFD and send out a pull-request for
> other sub-system maintainers to pull from.
> 
> If you would like to co-ordinate it instead, you'd be welcome to.
> However, I (and probably Linus) would need a succinct immutable branch
> to pull from.

Oh, that'd be perfect, sorry, I didn't realize there was already a plan.
If you're willing to carry on as intended, please do.

Colin if there is another version please make a note of the above
merging plan in the cover letter and drop the net-next tag. 
Just in  case my goldfish brain forgets.