Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <03096156-3478-db03-c015-28643479116c@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
 <48d01ce7-e028-c103-ea7f-5a4ea4c8930b@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
 <2646e8a3-cc9f-c2c5-e4d6-c86de6e1b739@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
 <YsvbgxJ80kMP5juv@kroah.com> <601436f2-b13e-6c24-bcfd-29548e288f23@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To: <601436f2-b13e-6c24-bcfd-29548e288f23@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 11 Jul 2022 20:14:03 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0g9v35m9vaSeBC19axqRuNqG7qp+AGPn8wRb3Gzn+H9CA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] PM: hibernate: allow wait_for_device_probe() to
 timeout when resuming from hibernation
To:     Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
        Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@google.com>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 1:21 PM Tetsuo Handa
<penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
>
> On 2022/07/11 17:12, Greg KH wrote:
> >                                                        creating a
> > locking loop like this should be resolved first,
>
> Rafael and Arjan, can we agree with removing wait_for_device_probe() from snapshot_open() ?

No, we can't.