Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 11 Jul 2022 13:08:10 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To:     Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Cc:     devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: fix wrong clock documentation
 for qcom,rpmcc
Message-ID: <20220711190810.GA106686-robh@kernel.org>
References: <20220706225321.26215-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
 <20220706225321.26215-2-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220706225321.26215-2-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 07 Jul 2022 00:53:18 +0200, Christian Marangi wrote:
> qcom,rpmcc describe 2 different kind of device.
> Currently we have definition for rpm-smd based device but we lack
> Documentation for simple rpm based device.
> 
> Add the missing clk for ipq806x, apq8060, msm8660 and apq8064 and
> provide additional example to describe these new simple rpm based
> devices.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.yaml | 85 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>