Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 11 Jul 2022 13:22:43 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To:     Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
Cc:     x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        elver@google.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, vschneid@redhat.com,
        Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] cpumask: Fix invalid uniprocessor assumptions
Message-Id: <20220711132243.76275f03800fc612589b3225@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <f58ee2c553ea8ae991454a8e195dcbd2821f794c.camel@svanheule.net>
References: <cover.1656777646.git.sander@svanheule.net>
        <20220702133840.943817a7694406a135bb48a9@linux-foundation.org>
        <6a4ea3d21bfb4c692d257d3f38ba28c83f242dfc.camel@svanheule.net>
        <20220703133921.6800bf1e7df3b00cb586a3c1@linux-foundation.org>
        <f58ee2c553ea8ae991454a8e195dcbd2821f794c.camel@svanheule.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 08:51:08 +0200 Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net> w=
rote:

> > > can I still send a v5 to move the last patch forward in the series, a=
nd to
> > > include Yury's tags?
> >=20
> > I already added Yury's ack.=A0 Please tell me the specific patch orderi=
ng
> > and I'll take care of that.
> >=20
>=20
> The updated patch order should be:
>    x86/cacheinfo: move shared cache map definitions
>    cpumask: add UP optimised for_each_*_cpu versions
>    cpumask: fix invalid uniprocessor mask assumption
>    lib/test: introduce cpumask KUnit test suite
>    cpumask: update cpumask_next_wrap() signature
>=20
> Reordering the patches on my tree didn't produce any conflicts.

Got it, thanks.