Received: by 2002:ad5:4acb:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n11csp3752914imw; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 15:19:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1ssZpEM0wnh43N3h14NuTOZ+nD7NLKKawO4jN2KvmDcSfU79wZCABg9PND0cCCX+0nc5gCU X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1b45:b0:1f0:941:f09c with SMTP id nv5-20020a17090b1b4500b001f00941f09cmr595843pjb.65.1657577955487; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 15:19:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1657577955; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=q/adgrqWgqZpn3xo1oVDfvbScN6Q9PN8mVS1Pw13/hIuCG5CzYTpL02ctKQFrsFfGT uRvcC7M9ugpWLc10r+Wce2094/HdrOLoZD4dWOeZSaMW9+qsMmZI0tPA2lNhWWGYhNM+ aIgBUKuHnNaCASJ4tXhfmhDsXyNDt+wsLXq2UIqRySanEgsp6htyIUfGlI+oHH+ilTm5 jol7XE0i+E/AcKfsd+bW0UpXnRxzLd2xj0ES9XqXi+QOiPbmMlRb6C4vzfUXSgjcE/M6 PS+xbrchYX2THbnFzHcdcCYeXfA8WBcKlWmOHESvI/inkNUFQVOn754aHA0jVk2hWtz+ JpCw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:subject:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from; bh=sWjNtuZZ7yozxOc60CQ58bisikVID3Y1bwZmatvh8QY=; b=h97E/a9ohAvQ8g3gihcM27rRZRNOSr+wD1jZ1My+6nryo4XOdMfCkptMdmw7z3xMvZ vXM+g0hy+o5mIdl7U5DDUuzmIM6E/VVMPiBubOlYvvO4DK5EqQ+zFlhxyB9yTLUXd+ZC vYdBEN+z90Mfz7qh0En/1Fu06aglJStUKYiC7tcoHGBUEksJFs4Sk9faHEwa1U79ilwh 9kY/1etpSyE4DVNfrVILRh2Qkg5phgABb9pVWCIAMcAqXW0wddCCQFVHh0OSP3c7ZDbV 045zMFBTqjxcbMXwiI+9MO9QqmVaoaRndEyOs8G4rFDBWt/z3fyQmuNCxEkbikI8M9aG QXYQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h190-20020a6383c7000000b004129a78936fsi11351580pge.1.2022.07.11.15.19.03; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 15:19:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231216AbiGKWEe (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 11 Jul 2022 18:04:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43218 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229717AbiGKWEc (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2022 18:04:32 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com (out02.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.232]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8602C509F8 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 15:04:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]:59882) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1oB1W2-006u22-Jr; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:04:30 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-174-4.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.174.4]:46748 helo=email.froward.int.ebiederm.org.xmission.com) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1oB1W1-00H0EA-J3; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:04:30 -0600 From: "Eric W. Biederman" To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: LKML References: <20220628161441.892925-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> <87o7xvcw98.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 17:04:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Jason A. Donenfeld's message of "Mon, 11 Jul 2022 22:18:13 +0200") Message-ID: <87pmib9uhl.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1oB1W1-00H0EA-J3;;;mid=<87pmib9uhl.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.174.4;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=softfail X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1/1HTqajhPT84+ODD85nv77lVNjH4ulgdI= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.174.4 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa07 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: **;"Jason A. Donenfeld" X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 476 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 15 (3.1%), b_tie_ro: 13 (2.7%), parse: 1.92 (0.4%), extract_message_metadata: 15 (3.2%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.25 (0.3%), tests_pri_-1000: 5 (1.1%), tests_pri_-950: 1.46 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 1.09 (0.2%), tests_pri_-90: 111 (23.4%), check_bayes: 109 (22.9%), b_tokenize: 6 (1.2%), b_tok_get_all: 5 (1.1%), b_comp_prob: 1.85 (0.4%), b_tok_touch_all: 93 (19.6%), b_finish: 1.04 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 165 (34.6%), check_dkim_signature: 0.63 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 3.2 (0.7%), poll_dns_idle: 136 (28.6%), tests_pri_10: 2.5 (0.5%), tests_pri_500: 152 (32.1%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] signal: break out of wait loops on kthread_stop() X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Jason A. Donenfeld" writes: > Hi Eric, > > Thanks for the review. > >> Which I guess my long way of saying I think you can just change >> kthread_stop to say: >> >> diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c >> index 544fd4097406..52e9b3432496 100644 >> --- a/kernel/kthread.c >> +++ b/kernel/kthread.c >> @@ -704,6 +704,7 @@ int kthread_stop(struct task_struct *k) >> kthread = to_kthread(k); >> set_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP, &kthread->flags); >> kthread_unpark(k); >> + set_tsk_thread_flag(k, TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL); >> wake_up_process(k); >> wait_for_completion(&kthread->exited); >> ret = kthread->result; >> > > Okay. I'll constrain it to just kthread_stop(). But please file away in > the back of your mind the potential for kthread_park() to be problematic > down the line, in case we have to fix that later. Definitely. Right now I am certain you are motivated to test and make certain the kthread_stop case will work. I just have the feeling that we don't care enough about kthread_park, and so attempting to solve it now is as likely to cause problems as solve them. Eric