Received: by 2002:ad5:4acb:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n11csp3803659imw; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:34:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vuNJHPeSOrIOZnRKaZbZmopRLYlZMEbvwF2FNSsGipti7bToiPwF+kWzhSGVqZRm0yIAS6 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:11:b0:431:680c:cca1 with SMTP id d17-20020a056402001100b00431680ccca1mr28633565edu.420.1657582472376; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:34:32 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1657582472; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eb0iTEl0xVNTcj7sidqnnk41YwCgkAj5vng9Z8oIlG1ONQY8DqE3iOEPcx/dz4GPcL u2vUOWxg2BHxJdOBNLZuFuLOpBDOvYZ1Dxk2y2ZC+FrgkbwUmmCpvzmJElCwZhD/AI8J NQE0zfqK2eyj9MPaRX3VL1TJSHHeKxuVt9uYOL0vjvVLjvApMG6YAOCF9RGG1Tdlh3HC 5NoE9BsT9SaQQrOhf30N6LAxBcw/omks710kMRyTy6aFzilUxel/0rMy0S5Rx6Lu4J8/ u9ZV26i967LSpj9qpkd/bI54Q2kD6VRlx9/zV26I/XAAT3yTGAnTEzZePN08WRs0ZWGU /J9w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=/avvaukbqL1mfs9TCGxMHEdTty78hgHUU7Vwzj84cWM=; b=cRQUGLUbcll3P81jshngMLzm8ldIFh1rOdYDZv6yDEauiReGZi0Q7cBz+Mp+wGE4yu tiIIpcCOi0D95yeDofcVoH/lFF+esT7/JnGMr1yte0rji14+dEV2Jvs3nb05Dqizk1Ys J5o0Pslkt6ClKLSf8L2eyNousX+7AL8zalNfIgLgdp2Ze1TIo2866lOfZRf6tzS4rnFn nSWz3Csv3jTWN+V7iNPmaz12PNRd2skUAMs0FPjG3VlhGQ4cP+Qi55ilDahycOLSVuPb 3AW+JwDObHkp9qBvtsxj1r8WbBOqVCj0Ak0La22obBbIl1ZUq6yfD2W42l8LO+u8ndUJ N73g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@zx2c4.com header.s=20210105 header.b=h7RauwaQ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=zx2c4.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hd34-20020a17090796a200b0072b52d5f9e4si348820ejc.988.2022.07.11.16.34.08; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:34:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@zx2c4.com header.s=20210105 header.b=h7RauwaQ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=zx2c4.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230236AbiGKXVj (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 11 Jul 2022 19:21:39 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43160 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229776AbiGKXVh (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2022 19:21:37 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AA1A59266 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:21:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D01D5B8161D for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 23:21:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E564C34115; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 23:21:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=zx2c4.com header.i=@zx2c4.com header.b="h7RauwaQ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zx2c4.com; s=20210105; t=1657581691; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/avvaukbqL1mfs9TCGxMHEdTty78hgHUU7Vwzj84cWM=; b=h7RauwaQEyHEOwvIgh8eT6KX1wWY3yVZdtza8fROASL+/E8TzI6UoWAse+JujtHJVx9Gt1 jcQi/vG41cq/VN8eOBSZbD2/0+RAO6sFMRoap3+CPYn4LV1LEcs7i/uAcQplV6SABc6V6R /qANYJyhsNYhDpIq9N6nzke9g37nsVw= Received: by mail.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id f507e058 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Mon, 11 Jul 2022 23:21:31 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" To: ebiederm@xmission.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Subject: [PATCH v5] signal: break out of wait loops on kthread_stop() Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 01:21:23 +0200 Message-Id: <20220711232123.136330-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> In-Reply-To: <87h73n9ufn.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> References: <87h73n9ufn.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I was recently surprised to learn that msleep_interruptible(), wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(), and related functions simply hung when I called kthread_stop() on kthreads using them. The solution to fixing the case with msleep_interruptible() was more simply to move to schedule_timeout_interruptible(). Why? The reason is that msleep_interruptible(), and many functions just like it, has a loop like this: while (timeout && !signal_pending(current)) timeout = schedule_timeout_interruptible(timeout); The call to kthread_stop() woke up the thread, so schedule_timeout_ interruptible() returned early, but because signal_pending() returned true, it went back into another timeout, which was never woken up. This wait loop pattern is common to various pieces of code, and I suspect that the subtle misuse in a kthread that caused a deadlock in the code I looked at last week is also found elsewhere. So this commit causes signal_pending() to return true when kthread_stop() is called, by setting TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL. The same also probably applies to the similar kthread_park() functionality, but that can be addressed later, as its semantics are slightly different. Cc: Eric W. Biederman Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld --- Changes v4->v5: - Use set_tsk_thread_flag instead of test_and_set_tsk_thread_flag. Must have been a copy and paste mistarget. Changes v3->v4: - Don't address park() for now. - Don't bother clearing the flag, since the task is about to be freed anyway. kernel/kthread.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c index 3c677918d8f2..7243a010f433 100644 --- a/kernel/kthread.c +++ b/kernel/kthread.c @@ -704,6 +704,7 @@ int kthread_stop(struct task_struct *k) kthread = to_kthread(k); set_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP, &kthread->flags); kthread_unpark(k); + set_tsk_thread_flag(k, TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL); wake_up_process(k); wait_for_completion(&kthread->exited); ret = kthread->result; -- 2.35.1