Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 1 Dec 2001 06:19:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 1 Dec 2001 06:19:08 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:19207 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 1 Dec 2001 06:19:02 -0500 Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 09:18:54 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andrew Morton , Larry McVoy , Daniel Phillips , Henning Schmiedehausen , Jeff Garzik , Subject: Re: Coding style - a non-issue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote: > And don't EVER make the mistake that you can design something better than > what you get from ruthless massively parallel trial-and-error with a > feedback cycle. That's giving your intelligence _much_ too much credit. So, are we going to take out the appendix in 2.5 or will we continue hoping our kernel doesn't catch an illness without actually doing anything preventive ? Biological selection does nothing except removing the weak ones, it cannot automatically create systems which work well. In short, I believe the biological selection is just that, selection. The creation of stuff will need some direction. regards, Rik -- Shortwave goes a long way: irc.starchat.net #swl http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/