Received: by 2002:ad5:4acb:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n11csp4062910imw; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 00:29:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1sFGxmwjyoaDvBoQyV77SY3em3FAwKsFMe66Qt6yVjlJQWKgnFRcvCCLNpT7ckAZOy63FbX X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:6b45:b0:1e3:3cfa:3104 with SMTP id x5-20020a17090a6b4500b001e33cfa3104mr2750918pjl.113.1657610945439; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 00:29:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1657610945; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TZo2j8b/ErpwZi9z/WPmPC9G75xonu4Nw6fSBl/mopoKfF+k21CxWx11VGQaJ4KsnS pnn2zx9bKqGw/F8QmJNSgdidoO+4zM1g8ZQ2rKrMvDdEp1QdCXs655b9z3LS95S2XPRA W/l2/Eo3p64aXtctpHeU1uQiqbcm2ZjSRELAwl1GLVBmCeePFbdTwrbnewrEXT4Zn1WC deTcx3jTsjF2CRxtR5MLyVRcTWlVOkUe/eucoIBwGKOUc0iDxSXOFqKnGGCMC26eaeau ol5fUb3nnSI+KwFmGrvPkplXIeu4+kzKt6mUBnnEHN8kRG2VI1KbLRBCX9RLKodVukr+ Go/w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=2YM552sYXIUQHzGkfV0RrVu9+D/kbteJbhq+ccfgt9E=; b=VoP9uAU2RJJF5dxqfbkZk0zvd3f7IBQlnOoyJGWEvxt1bBYWXV0/8YxyJKIqcFnL6O A7VRZXmHR9GMDe6xf9mp5JAhBafSq46E9MkNdAyUikbPtwMCnh0zU7dHiYI5p20nVRcz TKnF4t0ObJpeYBitL7uVM7BQLzvDnOh+cTCPBDy3s79faTcXDw0XDsLn/U6jvKU6NLQj Ozu17VtYaa3jvX3AsUS4WQdiQLOkLbxIqcyH7M/quVqghIABeM+JmFsp+2EmcEzFcC3N Q4BvvZaJgJ3cuBZdDohktSvhMVk0MDmB8iTPDfO7i9CddQdp0k4PP2SGqUHbk92HxplM O6BQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z196-20020a6333cd000000b00415c2ce36f2si11531195pgz.140.2022.07.12.00.28.52; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 00:29:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232300AbiGLHME (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 03:12:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51452 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229747AbiGLHMC (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 03:12:02 -0400 Received: from muru.com (muru.com [72.249.23.125]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 284E52AE2D; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 00:12:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muru.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CD0880B5; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 07:06:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 10:12:00 +0300 From: Tony Lindgren To: Saravana Kannan Cc: Rob Herring , Geert Uytterhoeven , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Kevin Hilman , Ulf Hansson , Len Brown , Pavel Machek , Joerg Roedel , Will Deacon , Andrew Lunn , Heiner Kallweit , Russell King , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Linus Walleij , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , David Ahern , Android Kernel Team , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "open list:THERMAL" , Linux IOMMU , netdev , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Alexander Stein Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] PM: domains: Delete usage of driver_deferred_probe_check_state() Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Tony Lindgren [220701 16:00]: > Also, looks like both with the initcall change for prm, and the patch > below, there seems to be also another problem where my test devices no > longer properly idle somehow compared to reverting the your two patches > in next. Sorry looks like was a wrong conclusion. While trying to track down this issue, I cannot reproduce it. So I don't see issues idling with either the initcall change or your test patch. Not sure what caused my earlier tests to fail though. Maybe a config change to enable more debugging, or possibly some kind of warm reset vs cold reset type issue. Regards, Tony