Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <a6534fdc-a21c-5784-8eb7-ee892275fc0a@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 12 Jul 2022 12:09:39 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] pwm: dwc: add snps,pwm-number to limit pwm count
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@sifive.com>, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>,
        Jude Onyenegecha <jude.onyenegecha@sifive.com>,
        Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@sifive.com>,
        William Salmon <william.salmon@sifive.com>,
        Adnan Chowdhury <adnan.chowdhury@sifive.com>
References: <20220712100113.569042-1-ben.dooks@sifive.com>
 <20220712100113.569042-8-ben.dooks@sifive.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20220712100113.569042-8-ben.dooks@sifive.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 12/07/2022 12:01, Ben Dooks wrote:
> Add snps,pwm-number property to indicate if the block does not have
> all 8 of the PWM blocks.
> 
> Not sure if this should be a general PWM property consider optional
> for all PWM types, so have added a specific one here (there is only
> one other controller with a property for PWM count at the moment)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@sifive.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-synposys.yaml | 5 +++++

No. Please do not hide bindings patches in the code. They must be
separate and checkpatch complains about it, so please be sure you run
checkpatch.


Best regards,
Krzysztof