Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 12 Jul 2022 11:42:32 +0100
Message-ID: <87edyq1ujr.wl-maz@kernel.org>
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To:     Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, agross@kernel.org,
        linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: spmi-gpio: make the irqchip immutable
In-Reply-To: <20220624195112.894916-1-robimarko@gmail.com>
References: <20220624195112.894916-1-robimarko@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue)
 FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/27.1
 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 20:51:12 +0100,
Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Commit 6c846d026d49 ("gpio: Don't fiddle with irqchips marked as
> immutable") added a warning to indicate if the gpiolib is altering the
> internals of irqchips.
> 
> Following this change the following warning is now observed for the SPMI
> PMIC pinctrl driver:
> gpio gpiochip1: (200f000.spmi:pmic@0:gpio@c000): not an immutable chip, please consider fixing it!
> 
> Fix this by making the irqchip in the SPMI PMIC pinctrl driver immutable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c
> index c3255b0bece4..406ee0933d0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c
> @@ -171,7 +171,6 @@ struct pmic_gpio_state {
>  	struct regmap	*map;
>  	struct pinctrl_dev *ctrl;
>  	struct gpio_chip chip;
> -	struct irq_chip irq;
>  	u8 usid;
>  	u8 pid_base;
>  };
> @@ -988,6 +987,17 @@ static void *pmic_gpio_populate_parent_fwspec(struct gpio_chip *chip,
>  	return fwspec;
>  }
>  
> +static const struct irq_chip spmi_gpio_irq_chip = {
> +	.name		= "spmi-gpio",
> +	.irq_ack	= irq_chip_ack_parent,
> +	.irq_mask	= irq_chip_mask_parent,
> +	.irq_unmask	= irq_chip_unmask_parent,

No, this is wrong. Please look at the documentation to see how you
must now directly call into the gpiolib helpers for these two
callbacks.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.