Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
References: <20220712013125.623338-1-schspa@gmail.com>
 <20220712095325.408d1730@gandalf.local.home>
User-agent: mu4e 1.7.5; emacs 28.1
From:   Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc:     mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
        vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
        bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com,
        vschneid@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] sched/rt: fix bad task migration for rt tasks
Date:   Tue, 12 Jul 2022 22:37:05 +0800
In-reply-to: <20220712095325.408d1730@gandalf.local.home>
Message-ID: <m28royflc9.fsf@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk


Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> writes:

> On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 09:31:24 +0800
> Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> @@ -1998,11 +1998,15 @@ static struct rq *find_lock_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq)
>>  			 * the mean time, task could have
>>  			 * migrated already or had its affinity changed.
>>  			 * Also make sure that it wasn't scheduled on its rq.
>> +			 * It is possible the task was scheduled, set
>> +			 * "migrate_disabled" and then got preempted, And we
>> +			 * check task migration disable flag here too.
>
> Nit.  "got preempted, so we must check the task migration disable flag here
> too".
>

OK, I will make a upload for this too.

> But other than that.
>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> -- Steve
>
>>  			 */


-- 
BRs
Schspa Shi