Received: by 2002:ad5:4acb:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n11csp4685484imw; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 12:23:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tPd7cI4hmuunvcFYhFatsj7P7oKNgQG3UgS6IuHWanpad0Oltjaib5a9nVLFhsMUsxq4NQ X-Received: by 2002:a63:1f18:0:b0:414:f515:dc93 with SMTP id f24-20020a631f18000000b00414f515dc93mr21514931pgf.443.1657653799968; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 12:23:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1657653799; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tKbbGCGQihIww2oCU6XGM9y2LIHIhK62f5FHkOYRJVonz63z+2aQTysZCd1cTSRTez aD7MaAVDcs5I3DORY8EtGa6HZlN+hmDm6fOJRqQH5EfcSvIWBhH6MJqdict2nX9Dxb/f YxhufL5tVsarglh1r/zA+O9qQWixXqZk3ZlTOda8cuDv8/n/jVncKWM1ttiRP76GNipJ PVLMd4WeGocyi3sc4OrXa0mD4rmqNXNMw1wuUXYF1yODVIM3+XLsucE093SlnZRezvFo zEDfbnlaqZ0o6vcSfi0tYMgSoFLfZsI9lGniTW2vr2r7phzJX40toDNhKdaum6G6UYuD /YzQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=PsEwFkqNZ65i1S1BtiGxC3T0RwJfbjxjMvU3m5ga1xQ=; b=uiivyswYe0zwopHb+t7SDhjRZhOOCh/gqM5O1xApKK3jlh+2SAFdtgF/FvlytynYZS HshnTYvy6PBDPQWRLOZ/GoPCv/8VaB1+UJMz+RybjYb2/qbBtrih3z0Wk61JXcdu0S3y 3do1stkfJBKAMicNM1CIJVwz+/lX5/MPTkS8cjK27UJndiGqwvzO2NjOVaslm4GEI3XN zQHKFie+Mgm2i0kryL2YyD5NqSuNd00Fskub/+B/VlAK3mi3djLRfKozGLCTENAJgjB9 +Sp9QDvIyjFTWLvRCAzP6WFKqw6V/EXPZrns7EDLWluGPgFTOj8mHUl9N6HW02dTsjcn qqmQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=q4+EW2EX; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e20-20020a170902f11400b00163937195e7si12902873plb.372.2022.07.12.12.23.06; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 12:23:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=q4+EW2EX; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235801AbiGLTLf (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 15:11:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39764 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235980AbiGLTKC (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 15:10:02 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B71BCFFE36; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 11:52:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6707B81BBF; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 18:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 072A0C3411C; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 18:52:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1657651956; bh=hoHz08tC6oiQQAdYnqJuaTV4rl7eX2oX/fx/GpRDRro=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=q4+EW2EXLY88Ovxni1/14b3ECqZG9mejp0m7iEV8wQeZ5q2vvHpb+2AfJf1Mnvclr BRrT3jkQg8C2fS3mQ3OZMHylJKLCVXcAfcHYHNH30zGnZ7M+oLO9H/Sdx53AodxC2U +AiV5PTe6ctyf11gExyjXQ2JyMwqJSHYZN8GPv50= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Borislav Petkov , Josh Poimboeuf , Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo Subject: [PATCH 5.18 34/61] objtool: Update Retpoline validation Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 20:39:31 +0200 Message-Id: <20220712183238.342232911@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.0 In-Reply-To: <20220712183236.931648980@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20220712183236.931648980@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Peter Zijlstra commit 9bb2ec608a209018080ca262f771e6a9ff203b6f upstream. Update retpoline validation with the new CONFIG_RETPOLINE requirement of not having bare naked RET instructions. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h | 6 ++++++ arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_boot.S | 2 ++ arch/x86/xen/xen-head.S | 1 + tools/objtool/check.c | 19 +++++++++++++------ 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h @@ -76,6 +76,12 @@ .endm /* + * (ab)use RETPOLINE_SAFE on RET to annotate away 'bare' RET instructions + * vs RETBleed validation. + */ +#define ANNOTATE_UNRET_SAFE ANNOTATE_RETPOLINE_SAFE + +/* * JMP_NOSPEC and CALL_NOSPEC macros can be used instead of a simple * indirect jmp/call which may be susceptible to the Spectre variant 2 * attack. --- a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_boot.S +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_boot.S @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(sme_encrypt_execute) pop %rbp /* Offset to __x86_return_thunk would be wrong here */ + ANNOTATE_UNRET_SAFE ret int3 SYM_FUNC_END(sme_encrypt_execute) @@ -154,6 +155,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__enc_copy) pop %r15 /* Offset to __x86_return_thunk would be wrong here */ + ANNOTATE_UNRET_SAFE ret int3 .L__enc_copy_end: --- a/arch/x86/xen/xen-head.S +++ b/arch/x86/xen/xen-head.S @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START(hypercall_page) .rept (PAGE_SIZE / 32) UNWIND_HINT_FUNC ANNOTATE_NOENDBR + ANNOTATE_UNRET_SAFE ret /* * Xen will write the hypercall page, and sort out ENDBR. --- a/tools/objtool/check.c +++ b/tools/objtool/check.c @@ -2114,8 +2114,9 @@ static int read_retpoline_hints(struct o } if (insn->type != INSN_JUMP_DYNAMIC && - insn->type != INSN_CALL_DYNAMIC) { - WARN_FUNC("retpoline_safe hint not an indirect jump/call", + insn->type != INSN_CALL_DYNAMIC && + insn->type != INSN_RETURN) { + WARN_FUNC("retpoline_safe hint not an indirect jump/call/ret", insn->sec, insn->offset); return -1; } @@ -3648,7 +3649,8 @@ static int validate_retpoline(struct obj for_each_insn(file, insn) { if (insn->type != INSN_JUMP_DYNAMIC && - insn->type != INSN_CALL_DYNAMIC) + insn->type != INSN_CALL_DYNAMIC && + insn->type != INSN_RETURN) continue; if (insn->retpoline_safe) @@ -3663,9 +3665,14 @@ static int validate_retpoline(struct obj if (!strcmp(insn->sec->name, ".init.text") && !module) continue; - WARN_FUNC("indirect %s found in RETPOLINE build", - insn->sec, insn->offset, - insn->type == INSN_JUMP_DYNAMIC ? "jump" : "call"); + if (insn->type == INSN_RETURN) { + WARN_FUNC("'naked' return found in RETPOLINE build", + insn->sec, insn->offset); + } else { + WARN_FUNC("indirect %s found in RETPOLINE build", + insn->sec, insn->offset, + insn->type == INSN_JUMP_DYNAMIC ? "jump" : "call"); + } warnings++; }