Received: by 2002:ad5:4acb:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n11csp4705163imw; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 12:44:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vSOo1D+ppKfjHQUT7jkzAlWu4xquLhXthwoY4Q4s3ilgayYVSQphXmNVUplwnI4DsCnmoR X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7dac:b0:722:3352:ac05 with SMTP id oz44-20020a1709077dac00b007223352ac05mr25708914ejc.421.1657655067045; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 12:44:27 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1657655067; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xJXmzWvd8iateDA7YgPJC42kkbwrNkYhy0F46tX/NOdXQialIIoXTjssek8s7yFDqC jJM8PAgooMKLkdq7jXaSozuKqGVsKJcbOzTRhmhIoAZHwmErS98AioU6qx/W+fk89Td9 x18MiLrjrlUio59M/Yz88cO6KuK+bwbo/v9/WHYh1qBakMmTjfYj9FYHKClvnt9UDKnq 1gLKHkqJA8pxD8vtq1uBF3aYkq0STx1pnGQIAgPFTekEN2oaRHcQo7orpYSwyhT9fUPq R2J0cToAfWqBlNxH8PLQYV7stsKJfsDKZuuU7wnzTt6GwLiIK9MiziycZxEn7xbuPsnt 5d8Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=aXjWpNSJN0995C8PQ0zbTCHRzXaALtkTGEmzem/tfD4=; b=01bhcYiO8mKTsGasOe/GWMmWXkq+//Co7jixmCfqKC8Z1Tg+tDS/UpXU2RH6ZJ+CIa x1KGGycsbMiN3rOXhJKYgEU4BVj9bgLipmGh4OueBr2J/IZcQRgzAGhM2p25M8EPI4lc bfe9bKewLY/VYg6aLNQ/fbb+egFzP4+dnkVFXOhVAGYhVuqw3zDUdANSS+VBAtmmWk2N j7/yQfI0FCxazBPRClyE994P7Ul7PdYX2xzttjdcM3iZdGQSpNNbzL5raA0fGBfGqdxm I1gs3a5+9FBRV6IRKCqQONrUXqKfssajjWvNwjs9NEqwfR9GNL0qJWkwIHrzq/VpKGni 7ZOA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=a3pZaCO3; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id sa1-20020a1709076d0100b0072b7c700b99si4376759ejc.662.2022.07.12.12.44.02; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 12:44:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=a3pZaCO3; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235933AbiGLTN2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 15:13:28 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48392 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235788AbiGLTM4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 15:12:56 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CAB9DA0F3; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 11:53:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCD99B81BAC; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 18:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52FE8C341C8; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 18:53:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1657652005; bh=dJqb4hv5d6AnIaSUEISTwbLeEMxQgHl5YFw+VO9KgA4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=a3pZaCO3FD6rxU6Ms+DRMBzMUqb3Hy4dTuwpR6+tPUz84tcqcFBLtQwChj/imXtf6 1Et3NPzoxd7neVPZh3fV/cX63BvKZp+yNVLde8tnlBAUuGj+P2F5cgkf2NSxK5D+pi Ajismro3iA+yHHIGXF9xB40WhkV8cWOX7zxJpbRk= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Josh Poimboeuf , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Borislav Petkov , Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo Subject: [PATCH 5.18 51/61] x86/speculation: Fill RSB on vmexit for IBRS Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 20:39:48 +0200 Message-Id: <20220712183238.962056567@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.0 In-Reply-To: <20220712183236.931648980@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20220712183236.931648980@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Josh Poimboeuf commit 9756bba28470722dacb79ffce554336dd1f6a6cd upstream. Prevent RSB underflow/poisoning attacks with RSB. While at it, add a bunch of comments to attempt to document the current state of tribal knowledge about RSB attacks and what exactly is being mitigated. Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 2 - arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S | 6 +-- 3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ /* FREE! ( 7*32+10) */ #define X86_FEATURE_PTI ( 7*32+11) /* Kernel Page Table Isolation enabled */ #define X86_FEATURE_KERNEL_IBRS ( 7*32+12) /* "" Set/clear IBRS on kernel entry/exit */ -/* FREE! ( 7*32+13) */ +#define X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT ( 7*32+13) /* "" Fill RSB on VM-Exit */ #define X86_FEATURE_INTEL_PPIN ( 7*32+14) /* Intel Processor Inventory Number */ #define X86_FEATURE_CDP_L2 ( 7*32+15) /* Code and Data Prioritization L2 */ #define X86_FEATURE_MSR_SPEC_CTRL ( 7*32+16) /* "" MSR SPEC_CTRL is implemented */ --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c @@ -1394,17 +1394,70 @@ static void __init spectre_v2_select_mit pr_info("%s\n", spectre_v2_strings[mode]); /* - * If spectre v2 protection has been enabled, unconditionally fill - * RSB during a context switch; this protects against two independent - * issues: + * If Spectre v2 protection has been enabled, fill the RSB during a + * context switch. In general there are two types of RSB attacks + * across context switches, for which the CALLs/RETs may be unbalanced. * - * - RSB underflow (and switch to BTB) on Skylake+ - * - SpectreRSB variant of spectre v2 on X86_BUG_SPECTRE_V2 CPUs + * 1) RSB underflow + * + * Some Intel parts have "bottomless RSB". When the RSB is empty, + * speculated return targets may come from the branch predictor, + * which could have a user-poisoned BTB or BHB entry. + * + * AMD has it even worse: *all* returns are speculated from the BTB, + * regardless of the state of the RSB. + * + * When IBRS or eIBRS is enabled, the "user -> kernel" attack + * scenario is mitigated by the IBRS branch prediction isolation + * properties, so the RSB buffer filling wouldn't be necessary to + * protect against this type of attack. + * + * The "user -> user" attack scenario is mitigated by RSB filling. + * + * 2) Poisoned RSB entry + * + * If the 'next' in-kernel return stack is shorter than 'prev', + * 'next' could be tricked into speculating with a user-poisoned RSB + * entry. + * + * The "user -> kernel" attack scenario is mitigated by SMEP and + * eIBRS. + * + * The "user -> user" scenario, also known as SpectreBHB, requires + * RSB clearing. + * + * So to mitigate all cases, unconditionally fill RSB on context + * switches. + * + * FIXME: Is this pointless for retbleed-affected AMD? */ setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RSB_CTXSW); pr_info("Spectre v2 / SpectreRSB mitigation: Filling RSB on context switch\n"); /* + * Similar to context switches, there are two types of RSB attacks + * after vmexit: + * + * 1) RSB underflow + * + * 2) Poisoned RSB entry + * + * When retpoline is enabled, both are mitigated by filling/clearing + * the RSB. + * + * When IBRS is enabled, while #1 would be mitigated by the IBRS branch + * prediction isolation protections, RSB still needs to be cleared + * because of #2. Note that SMEP provides no protection here, unlike + * user-space-poisoned RSB entries. + * + * eIBRS, on the other hand, has RSB-poisoning protections, so it + * doesn't need RSB clearing after vmexit. + */ + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE) || + boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_KERNEL_IBRS)) + setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT); + + /* * Retpoline protects the kernel, but doesn't protect firmware. IBRS * and Enhanced IBRS protect firmware too, so enable IBRS around * firmware calls only when IBRS / Enhanced IBRS aren't otherwise --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S @@ -194,15 +194,15 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(vmx_vmexit, SYM_L_GLOBAL * IMPORTANT: RSB filling and SPEC_CTRL handling must be done before * the first unbalanced RET after vmexit! * - * For retpoline, RSB filling is needed to prevent poisoned RSB entries - * and (in some cases) RSB underflow. + * For retpoline or IBRS, RSB filling is needed to prevent poisoned RSB + * entries and (in some cases) RSB underflow. * * eIBRS has its own protection against poisoned RSB, so it doesn't * need the RSB filling sequence. But it does need to be enabled * before the first unbalanced RET. */ - FILL_RETURN_BUFFER %_ASM_CX, RSB_CLEAR_LOOPS, X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE + FILL_RETURN_BUFFER %_ASM_CX, RSB_CLEAR_LOOPS, X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT pop %_ASM_ARG2 /* @flags */ pop %_ASM_ARG1 /* @vmx */