Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 12 Jul 2022 12:09:45 -0700
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc:     "linux-modules@vger.kernel.org" <linux-modules@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "atomlin@redhat.com" <atomlin@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] modules: move module symbols from init/Kconfig
Message-ID: <Ys3G+ZGr9k+2fTsx@bombadil.infradead.org>
References: <20220711162049.761342-1-mcgrof@kernel.org>
 <74dcc785-f3e7-6832-9af3-e0a0f69c58c9@csgroup.eu>
 <Ysx1C9IkJiFL+OH5@bombadil.infradead.org>
 <09f3ec9a-3a8e-d116-d38a-2fdb55f125c6@csgroup.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <09f3ec9a-3a8e-d116-d38a-2fdb55f125c6@csgroup.eu>
Sender: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@infradead.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 05:57:35AM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> 
> 
> Le 11/07/2022 ? 21:07, Luis Chamberlain a ?crit?:
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 06:33:08PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Le 11/07/2022 ? 18:20, Luis Chamberlain a ?crit?:
> >>> This moves all the module symbols from init/Kconfig to its
> >>> own dedicated file now that we have all of the module code in
> >>> its own directory.
> >>>
> >>> This does not introduce any functional changes.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
> >>
> >> It is similar to the patch I sent in February, isn't it ?
> >> (https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-modules/patch/4042712961d42186c449734c253511ea7076c780.1645543105.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu/)
> > 
> > Sorry, I had missed that. Can you send a new v2 based on today's
> > modules-next? And I'll just drop my patch?
> > 
> 
> I sent out v2 rebased on today's modules-next 
> (c76654e22da1e0cb830bd0eb5832072fb76df358)
> 
> I see all my patches still have status 'new' in modules's patchwork 
> (https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-modules/list/?submitter=192363).
> 
> Don't you maintain it ?

Yes but I never knew we used to have patchwork for modules, but glad we have
that now. Anyway all your patches are applied, is patchwork dumb to not
pick that up?

  Luis