Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 22:01:09 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "K.R. Foley" <kr@cybsft.com>
Cc: Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?
Message-ID: <20070531200109.GA8715@elte.hu>
References: <465EE33B.4070502@cybsft.com> <20070531153821.GA712@elte.hu> <465EFE31.30904@cybsft.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <465EFE31.30904@cybsft.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 903
Lines: 29


* K.R. Foley <kr@cybsft.com> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * K.R. Foley <kr@cybsft.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Ingo,
> >>
> >> I believe that patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 is misnamed. It applies cleanly to 
> >> 2.6.21 but seems to contain stuff that is already in 2.6.21.3.
> > 
> > yes - it includes all of 2.6.21.3.
> > 
> > 	Ingo
> > 
> 
> So actually it is not really misnamed, it's just done a bit 
> differently than previous versions. Sorry.

yeah. Maybe we should make the 2.6.21.3 -rt patches relative to 2.6.21.3 
- but that would be one extra patching step for people who already have 
a 2.6.21 tree. But ... maybe that makes the most sense after all.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/