Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 13 Jul 2022 18:56:08 +0900
From:   Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
To:     Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
Cc:     Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
        Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
        Nikolay Kichukov <nikolay@oldum.net>
Subject: Re: [V9fs-developer] [PATCH v5 11/11] net/9p: allocate appropriate
 reduced message buffers
Message-ID: <Ys6WuOh2MaicETuw@codewreck.org>
References: <cover.1657636554.git.linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
 <Ys3jjg52EIyITPua@codewreck.org>
 <4284956.GYXQZuIPEp@silver>
 <1998718.eTOXZt5M9a@silver>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1998718.eTOXZt5M9a@silver>
Precedence: bulk

Christian Schoenebeck wrote on Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:29:13AM +0200:
> > As this flag is going to be very RDMA-transport specific, I'm still
> > scratching my head for a good name though.
> 
> Or, instead of inventing some exotic flag name, maybe introducing an enum for 
> the individual 9p transport types?

That works for me as well

--
Dominique