Received: by 2002:ad5:4acb:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n11csp686436imw; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 06:19:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vC0o1zyy9MyxQCuJS10PAXH/CldErn1T0zhFNtXoIGBqXYbF/9+4y09bgNFPp5A/o+PGfc X-Received: by 2002:a62:1508:0:b0:528:be70:2f69 with SMTP id 8-20020a621508000000b00528be702f69mr3109004pfv.42.1657718356921; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 06:19:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1657718356; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VUVWSP3SlwqSRNcViZBSnD0XMej6h8P+4MJil5LF5frhI8G4paPFOrL0z9H/jD2jgO lckCb5Qa7I2NeGt6mTXwMU8/FOfetrjrcoZWN+fP5syd4GGuCFHLW3KD6/ZrBgG1bR3N 9B1ugzdV6U1KMisLp88aknO0uaJqxEhN4njAjGgkKbtC4PrwO06BfAOpcI9inwBNLgiW VSfSs6ppDXo/mIPVWIHT/sOg6Nr9EwDCip3myerZUrJVhUUtoIYKkDYSx4clQ5131y9M JB4za+tCaM5mG/qtnTW1S3ANOh9rP8y/yIk8VjF63tFau0/b2I//uFlORTP1nCud9M1S YlXw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-language:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=MyhgJNgSJQ9iXfy8wNUB0xJJACQTSSOXqa+XU8lWAOg=; b=jlbG5b+miW2HUh1amc9uw2yQMMThW91ESGt5cO+iIAVIW3lwixS8Xieuk7Vepc4Ivn 6UaZm0qd2urzaeMoCHZmzSe1Fpl+MXsrrYxK51KvR//rDfEBPPHGGpeQafe3sLwRCn2+ HGEIKskXAt/xyd+s+5JdcXxVGaKZyS6yTJvE/CbCKEgO+JlLAbJE3pAUapqxgHaSy6UN YzYFSsS8Uace6k057SXv510wKlgVmiVMz8DpWTxDIWo8U5twQH+1lfW5J/DAlLNq6vXF IIicdnWxFX969d/n1CiBGNvdxAGJfgZ8BUe3KzQKYj4l1TqxyzZxr3/Adz3tcFyUAk8B +Wkg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=GWBaNd5d; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z14-20020a170902d54e00b0016bf3b32fcfsi16488643plf.492.2022.07.13.06.19.03; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 06:19:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=GWBaNd5d; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231469AbiGMMzs (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 08:55:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42424 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234944AbiGMMzr (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 08:55:47 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3820D73927 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 05:55:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1657716945; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MyhgJNgSJQ9iXfy8wNUB0xJJACQTSSOXqa+XU8lWAOg=; b=GWBaNd5dZY73/OZdF7jjiV+/uccDlnCnQZAMr0J8mPi5e1/Ok8C7voY/+klBfLJHiYUJCj FpkwyOtEdkIsG/fASQUK/bieKvKAJiYMjSyXLEnKZOhDA3dfBn9a6JPDzziygaJa3QK9uS QAm9vYgJvAhARqbp+tpN8mcyD4PXFas= Received: from mail-pf1-f200.google.com (mail-pf1-f200.google.com [209.85.210.200]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-410-hfFwNP3qMaCeJf58vOqoPw-1; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 08:55:44 -0400 X-MC-Unique: hfFwNP3qMaCeJf58vOqoPw-1 Received: by mail-pf1-f200.google.com with SMTP id i21-20020aa79095000000b00528bd947f66so3962050pfa.18 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 05:55:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=MyhgJNgSJQ9iXfy8wNUB0xJJACQTSSOXqa+XU8lWAOg=; b=Nki1CyBI2dk3EeHngdhs0LvIrNTRwV5LoIUVn/Z9Y8LB5Bj+n38sZXBW0P3nDJsgGs nYU175g/RuFq+8LbEtTd3Kw+/wS/T5S2yaAB5EbtyYAfxKLPvCB/jI7jTw00Pe1s3e05 SF6nK1EQL6RVKvtDvYDlULvMaMYFdS5nrSXjgoaf5OwDV+e0Dd8fyFJcEtlSMktp0y3F rL3vZ44fQ6TkUKEmSxS/RfoZ4RxzmDTZ1WKK5LK6oRldi6aYtD8w7r6GV5Oo0/GLfPJg cw7eM8ircAedeqk4wkiNq1eRrVmLIw3xjI1Clp9IyZV/K0tkcjtAAN/0epcaHBnwy65b J3fQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/9cp2OOpPFnMTH3pmezI8QV3ReP1iO8OE3GoUkmAawHJ2EG74J H3zORo3fIQxxfhUadsrdaanBth1tDilIpPe1ap2C9hN54vj6arj7TcQBG0I+iN7YPJu562Gk3vK OkjbSA5QJXds6aT5MpO5KNmlP X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c7cb:b0:16b:dc5d:8959 with SMTP id r11-20020a170902c7cb00b0016bdc5d8959mr3338687pla.87.1657716943069; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 05:55:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c7cb:b0:16b:dc5d:8959 with SMTP id r11-20020a170902c7cb00b0016bdc5d8959mr3338657pla.87.1657716942626; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 05:55:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.72.14.22] ([209.132.188.80]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c1-20020a170902b68100b0016bd62bc003sm8760331pls.141.2022.07.13.05.55.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 05:55:41 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] ceph: fix up test_dummy_encryption handling for new mount API To: Jeff Layton , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, idryomov@gmail.com Cc: vshankar@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Biggers References: <20220713085641.50232-1-xiubli@redhat.com> From: Xiubo Li Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 20:55:35 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jeff, I am rebasing the 'wip-fscrypt' branch to the 'testing', and there is one commit conflicts: commit 81faddddbef409bcaa1aa3d89e59606cde94dab7 Author: Jeff Layton Date:?? Wed Dec 1 09:21:39 2021 -0500 ??? ceph: add infrastructure for file encryption and decryption ??? ...and allow test_dummy_encryption to bypass content encryption ??? if mounted with test_dummy_encryption=clear. ??? Reviewed-by: Xiubo Li ??? Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton And the conflicts are: [xiubli@fedora ]$ cat fs/ceph/super.h.rej --- fs/ceph/super.h +++ fs/ceph/super.h @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ ?#define CEPH_MOUNT_OPT_NOPAGECACHE???? (1<<16) /* bypass pagecache altogether */ ?#define CEPH_MOUNT_OPT_SPARSEREAD????? (1<<17) /* always do sparse reads */ ?#define CEPH_MOUNT_OPT_TEST_DUMMY_ENC? (1<<18) /* enable dummy encryption (for testing) */ +#define CEPH_MOUNT_OPT_DUMMY_ENC_CLEAR (1<<19) /* don't actually encrypt content */ ?#define CEPH_MOUNT_OPT_DEFAULT??? ??? ??? \ ???? (CEPH_MOUNT_OPT_DCACHE |??? ??? \ [xiubli@fedora ]$ cat fs/ceph/super.c.rej --- fs/ceph/super.c +++ fs/ceph/super.c @@ -1098,6 +1098,14 @@ static int ceph_set_test_dummy_encryption(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_cont ???? ??? ??? return -EEXIST; ???? ??? } +??? ??? /* HACK: allow for cleartext "encryption" in files for testing */ +??? ??? if (fsc->mount_options->test_dummy_encryption && + !strcmp(fsc->mount_options->test_dummy_encryption, "clear")) { +??? ??? ??? fsopt->flags |= CEPH_MOUNT_OPT_DUMMY_ENC_CLEAR; + kfree(fsc->mount_options->test_dummy_encryption); +??? ??? ??? fsc->mount_options->test_dummy_encryption = NULL; +??? ??? } + ???? ??? err = fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption(sb, fsc->mount_options->test_dummy_encryption, ???? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? &fsc->dummy_enc_policy); And I have pushed the tmp patches to https://github.com/lxbsz/ceph-client/commits/lxb-wip-fscrypt3. Please take a look is that okay ? Thanks -- Xiubo On 7/13/22 6:42 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Wed, 2022-07-13 at 16:56 +0800, xiubli@redhat.com wrote: >> From: Xiubo Li >> >> From Eric the "fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption()" will be removed >> in the next circle. Switch it to new APIs. >> >> Cc: Eric Biggers >> Cc: Jeff Layton >> Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li >> --- >> fs/ceph/crypto.c | 4 +-- >> fs/ceph/super.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ >> fs/ceph/super.h | 5 ++- >> 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/ceph/crypto.c b/fs/ceph/crypto.c >> index 7e0c48e12554..5b807f8f4c69 100644 >> --- a/fs/ceph/crypto.c >> +++ b/fs/ceph/crypto.c >> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static bool ceph_crypt_empty_dir(struct inode *inode) >> >> static const union fscrypt_policy *ceph_get_dummy_policy(struct super_block *sb) >> { >> - return ceph_sb_to_client(sb)->dummy_enc_policy.policy; >> + return ceph_sb_to_client(sb)->fsc_dummy_enc_policy.policy; >> } >> >> static struct fscrypt_operations ceph_fscrypt_ops = { >> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ void ceph_fscrypt_set_ops(struct super_block *sb) >> >> void ceph_fscrypt_free_dummy_policy(struct ceph_fs_client *fsc) >> { >> - fscrypt_free_dummy_policy(&fsc->dummy_enc_policy); >> + fscrypt_free_dummy_policy(&fsc->fsc_dummy_enc_policy); >> } >> >> int ceph_fscrypt_prepare_context(struct inode *dir, struct inode *inode, >> diff --git a/fs/ceph/super.c b/fs/ceph/super.c >> index fa59a804b32c..4ac4a90755a2 100644 >> --- a/fs/ceph/super.c >> +++ b/fs/ceph/super.c >> @@ -591,10 +591,16 @@ static int ceph_parse_mount_param(struct fs_context *fc, >> break; >> case Opt_test_dummy_encryption: >> #ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION >> - kfree(fsopt->test_dummy_encryption); >> - fsopt->test_dummy_encryption = param->string; >> - param->string = NULL; >> - fsopt->flags |= CEPH_MOUNT_OPT_TEST_DUMMY_ENC; >> + fscrypt_free_dummy_policy(&fsopt->dummy_enc_policy); >> + ret = fscrypt_parse_test_dummy_encryption(param, >> + &fsopt->dummy_enc_policy); >> + if (ret == -EINVAL) { >> + warnfc(fc, "Value of option \"%s\" is unrecognized", >> + param->key); >> + } else if (ret == -EEXIST) { >> + warnfc(fc, "Conflicting test_dummy_encryption options"); >> + ret = -EINVAL; >> + } >> #else >> warnfc(fc, >> "FS encryption not supported: test_dummy_encryption mount option ignored"); >> @@ -620,7 +626,7 @@ static void destroy_mount_options(struct ceph_mount_options *args) >> kfree(args->server_path); >> kfree(args->fscache_uniq); >> kfree(args->mon_addr); >> - kfree(args->test_dummy_encryption); >> + fscrypt_free_dummy_policy(&args->dummy_enc_policy); >> kfree(args); >> } >> >> @@ -1080,51 +1086,47 @@ static struct dentry *open_root_dentry(struct ceph_fs_client *fsc, >> return root; >> } >> >> -#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION >> -static int ceph_set_test_dummy_encryption(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc, >> - struct ceph_mount_options *fsopt) >> +static int ceph_apply_test_dummy_encryption(struct super_block *sb, >> + struct fs_context *fc, >> + struct ceph_mount_options *fsopt) >> { >> - /* >> - * No changing encryption context on remount. Note that >> - * fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption will validate the version >> - * string passed in (if any). >> - */ >> - if (fsopt->flags & CEPH_MOUNT_OPT_TEST_DUMMY_ENC) { >> - struct ceph_fs_client *fsc = sb->s_fs_info; >> - int err = 0; >> + struct ceph_fs_client *fsc = sb->s_fs_info; >> + int err; >> >> - if (fc->purpose == FS_CONTEXT_FOR_RECONFIGURE && !fsc->dummy_enc_policy.policy) { >> - errorfc(fc, "Can't set test_dummy_encryption on remount"); >> - return -EEXIST; >> - } >> + if (!fscrypt_is_dummy_policy_set(&fsopt->dummy_enc_policy)) >> + return 0; >> >> - err = fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption(sb, >> - fsc->mount_options->test_dummy_encryption, >> - &fsc->dummy_enc_policy); >> - if (err) { >> - if (err == -EEXIST) >> - errorfc(fc, "Can't change test_dummy_encryption on remount"); >> - else if (err == -EINVAL) >> - errorfc(fc, "Value of option \"%s\" is unrecognized", >> - fsc->mount_options->test_dummy_encryption); >> - else >> - errorfc(fc, "Error processing option \"%s\" [%d]", >> - fsc->mount_options->test_dummy_encryption, err); >> - return err; >> - } >> - warnfc(fc, "test_dummy_encryption mode enabled"); >> + /* No changing encryption context on remount. */ >> + if (fc->purpose == FS_CONTEXT_FOR_RECONFIGURE && >> + !fscrypt_is_dummy_policy_set(&fsc->fsc_dummy_enc_policy)) { >> + if (fscrypt_dummy_policies_equal(&fsopt->dummy_enc_policy, >> + &fsc->fsc_dummy_enc_policy)) >> + return 0; >> + errorfc(fc, "Can't set test_dummy_encryption on remount"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> } >> + >> + /* Also make sure fsopt doesn't contain a conflicting value. */ >> + if (fscrypt_is_dummy_policy_set(&fsc->fsc_dummy_enc_policy)) { >> + if (fscrypt_dummy_policies_equal(&fsopt->dummy_enc_policy, >> + &fsc->fsc_dummy_enc_policy)) >> + return 0; >> + errorfc(fc, "Conflicting test_dummy_encryption options"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + fsc->fsc_dummy_enc_policy = fsopt->dummy_enc_policy; >> + memset(&fsopt->dummy_enc_policy, 0, sizeof(fsopt->dummy_enc_policy)); >> + >> + err = fscrypt_add_test_dummy_key(sb, &fsc->fsc_dummy_enc_policy); >> + if (err) { >> + errorfc(fc, "Error adding test dummy encryption key, %d", err); >> + return err; >> + } >> + >> + warnfc(fc, "test_dummy_encryption mode enabled"); >> return 0; >> } >> -#else >> -static inline int ceph_set_test_dummy_encryption(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc, >> - struct ceph_mount_options *fsopt) >> -{ >> - if (fsopt->flags & CEPH_MOUNT_OPT_TEST_DUMMY_ENC) >> - warnfc(fc, "test_dummy_encryption mode ignored"); >> - return 0; >> -} >> -#endif >> >> /* >> * mount: join the ceph cluster, and open root directory. >> @@ -1154,7 +1156,7 @@ static struct dentry *ceph_real_mount(struct ceph_fs_client *fsc, >> goto out; >> } >> >> - err = ceph_set_test_dummy_encryption(fsc->sb, fc, fsc->mount_options); >> + err = ceph_apply_test_dummy_encryption(fsc->sb, fc, fsc->mount_options); >> if (err) >> goto out; >> >> @@ -1373,7 +1375,7 @@ static int ceph_reconfigure_fc(struct fs_context *fc) >> struct super_block *sb = fc->root->d_sb; >> struct ceph_fs_client *fsc = ceph_sb_to_client(sb); >> >> - err = ceph_set_test_dummy_encryption(sb, fc, fsopt); >> + err = ceph_apply_test_dummy_encryption(sb, fc, fsopt); >> if (err) >> return err; >> >> diff --git a/fs/ceph/super.h b/fs/ceph/super.h >> index bfc8bfcea799..5ea0ac6450dd 100644 >> --- a/fs/ceph/super.h >> +++ b/fs/ceph/super.h >> @@ -44,7 +44,6 @@ >> #define CEPH_MOUNT_OPT_ASYNC_DIROPS (1<<15) /* allow async directory ops */ >> #define CEPH_MOUNT_OPT_NOPAGECACHE (1<<16) /* bypass pagecache altogether */ >> #define CEPH_MOUNT_OPT_SPARSEREAD (1<<17) /* always do sparse reads */ >> -#define CEPH_MOUNT_OPT_TEST_DUMMY_ENC (1<<18) /* enable dummy encryption (for testing) */ >> >> #define CEPH_MOUNT_OPT_DEFAULT \ >> (CEPH_MOUNT_OPT_DCACHE | \ >> @@ -101,7 +100,7 @@ struct ceph_mount_options { >> char *server_path; /* default NULL (means "/") */ >> char *fscache_uniq; /* default NULL */ >> char *mon_addr; >> - char *test_dummy_encryption; /* default NULL */ >> + struct fscrypt_dummy_policy dummy_enc_policy; >> }; >> >> #define CEPH_ASYNC_CREATE_CONFLICT_BITS 8 >> @@ -148,7 +147,7 @@ struct ceph_fs_client { >> struct fscache_volume *fscache; >> #endif >> #ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION >> - struct fscrypt_dummy_policy dummy_enc_policy; >> + struct fscrypt_dummy_policy fsc_dummy_enc_policy; >> #endif >> }; >> > LGTM > > Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton >