Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220624195112.894916-1-robimarko@gmail.com> <87edyq1ujr.wl-maz@kernel.org>
 <20220712124445.GC21746@workstation> <87czea1i2f.wl-maz@kernel.org>
 <CAOX2RU5RX+H=omuKGye2fBy9dOFmfC9HC_3pekeGMxDJuReCUw@mail.gmail.com>
 <d8912a0d811b5eb924b8c4136b099f72@kernel.org> <CAOX2RU4MpyEQ0RtcrZ07VXRbB+SWWU=1zWfYUXhQFtvh=MCiDw@mail.gmail.com>
 <874jzl17lc.wl-maz@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <874jzl17lc.wl-maz@kernel.org>
From:   Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Jul 2022 15:34:46 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOX2RU5k0UJiJ7o3ULjLVLUO=cchT_Azdvzs5FKdjXLX1_muOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: spmi-gpio: make the irqchip immutable
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 15:10, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 13:33:32 +0100,
> Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 13:47, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2022-07-13 12:08, Robert Marko wrote:
> > > > I will look at IRQ GPIO docs, but in this case, then we have more
> > > > conversions that
> > > > are not correct.
> > >
> > > Then please point them out.
> >
> > Oh, now I get the issue, I was misunderstanding it completely.
> > gpiochip_enable_irq and gpiochip_disable_irq are not being called
> > at all.
> >
> > However, I dont see them being called before the conversion as well.
> > I am not really familiar with the PMIC IRQ-s, looked like an easy conversion
> > to get rid of the warning.
>
> They definitely were. Look at how gpiochip_add_data() eventually ends
> up calling gpiochip_set_irq_hooks((), which hijacks the irq_chip
> function pointers to insert the calls to these helpers.

Well, that is the thing, since irqchip->irq_enable and
irqchip->irq_disable were never
populated in the SPMI GPIO driver, gpiochip_set_irq_hooks then does
not insert them.
During runtime, gpiochip_irq_enable and gpiochip_irq_disable are never
used even before
the conversion, that is what I am trying to convey.

>
> This is what this conversion process is all about, and you absolutely
> need to understand that code before blindly changing drivers to squash
> a run-time warning.

Yeah, I agree, hopefully, I am not annoying.

Regards,
Robert
>
>         M.
>
> --
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.