Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHk-=wgTmGaToVFdSdoFqT2sNkk7jg2rSWasUYv-tASUZ2j_0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20220713050724.GA2471738@roeck-us.net> <CAHk-=widUqghhXus_GCM9+FESa5vHqMb_pO3=0dGYH8C+yix2w@mail.gmail.com>
 <Ys8hqoiN5iWbslsM@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <CAHk-=wjNxyXQqn=k0KipzUPoBYWQhUwybxee8GTkF_Oz6RPVFw@mail.gmail.com>
 <e63e108b-c99c-9ab7-0638-367b72983b81@roeck-us.net>
In-Reply-To: <e63e108b-c99c-9ab7-0638-367b72983b81@roeck-us.net>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 13 Jul 2022 13:42:15 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wh-SE=s+bJq_jwuQ6zfnifaAwYdXikpXo8iZ4JbbNph4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.19-rc6
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc:     "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>,
        Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
        Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
        Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 1:40 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>
> That patch is (and has been) in linux-next for a long time,
> as commit d2ca1fd2bc70, and with the following tags.
>
>      Fixes: 7719a68b2fa4 ("ARM: 9192/1: amba: fix memory leak in amba_device_try_add()")
>      Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>      Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>      Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
>      Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
>
> So, yes, it fixes the problem. I don't know where it is pulled from, though.
> I thought that it is from Russell's tree, given his Signed-off-by:,
> but I never really checked.

Heh. Yeah, with that sign-off, I bet it's in Russell's queue, bit it
just ended up in the "for next release" branch. Russell?

                 Linus