Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHk-=wgTmGaToVFdSdoFqT2sNkk7jg2rSWasUYv-tASUZ2j_0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20220713050724.GA2471738@roeck-us.net> <CAHk-=widUqghhXus_GCM9+FESa5vHqMb_pO3=0dGYH8C+yix2w@mail.gmail.com>
 <Ys8hqoiN5iWbslsM@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <CAHk-=wjNxyXQqn=k0KipzUPoBYWQhUwybxee8GTkF_Oz6RPVFw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADVatmMJ4f+3-z1SWOSXuygee3fMsLqjcWhEY=NLhSCj61OB5Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAHk-=wgUGp96_Wup3=Utws=Mn+07vi7ZXknv4nKZkAJv8Ezhnw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wgUGp96_Wup3=Utws=Mn+07vi7ZXknv4nKZkAJv8Ezhnw@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Jul 2022 22:50:06 +0100
Message-ID: <CADVatmPx=T_i1oaX2i_d5crbWkixFZU7s-_wky_kz58wDgwGDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.19-rc6
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>,
        Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
        Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
        Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 10:45 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 2:36 PM Sudip Mukherjee
> <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220524025139.40212-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com/
> > >
> > > That patch looks sane to me, but I guess Guenter would need to check
> >
> > I still see the failure in my builds with this patch. But surprisingly
> > I dont see the build failure (with or without this patch) with gcc-12,
> > only with gcc-11.
>
> Arrghs. "build failure"?

Uhh.. no, sorry.. I meant the same problem which Guenter reported with
powerpc64-linux-ld, hard float and soft float.
But I dont see this problem with gcc-12, only with gcc-11.


-- 
Regards
Sudip