Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 1 Dec 2001 11:05:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 1 Dec 2001 11:04:55 -0500 Received: from [63.204.6.12] ([63.204.6.12]:62105 "EHLO mail.somanetworks.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 1 Dec 2001 11:04:37 -0500 Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 11:04:30 -0500 From: "Mark Frazer" To: Stephan von Krawczynski Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux/Pro [was Re: Coding style - a non-issue] Message-ID: <20011201110430.A4737@somanetworks.com> In-Reply-To:

<20011130110546.V14710@work.bitmover.com>

<20011130155740.I14710@work.bitmover.com> <20011201022157.38ed90b5.skraw@ithnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20011201022157.38ed90b5.skraw@ithnet.com>; from skraw@ithnet.com on Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 02:21:57AM +0100 X-Message-Flag: Lookout! Organization: Detectable, well, not really Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephan von Krawczynski [01/11/30 20:27]: > 4) Warning, this is the hard stuff! > Ok, so you are fond of SUN. Well, me too. But I am not completely blind, not > yet :-) So I must tell you, if Solaris were the real big hit, then why its > Intel-Version is virtualy been eaten up on the market (the _buying_ market out > there) by linux? I can't say for the O/S buying market. But I do embedded (pretty large embedded systems but embedded nonetheless) development and we walked away from Solaris after comparing the complexity of our first network drivers. STREAMS: just say no. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/